Trosis wrote:
It’s tough to RP war with a cabal as a whole.
How difficult would it be to bring back relics, but there is no consequence to losing them?
You don’t lose cabal skills or spells. You only have the shame of being unable to protect what matters most to your cabal.
I think this would add some good RP dynamic to people who want to RPPK.
Wasn’t CRS removed because it was a The Rich Get Richer scenario? You’re handicapped without your spells and you have to take on a more powerful inner guardian? People were getting upset that they couldn’t use their seekrat kewl spells?
Hopefully the CRS code still exists out there and the archives and maybe a few lines can be commented out so that skill/spells aren’t removed?
What does everyone think? Would this be a positive new dynamic?
I think I'd rather see some of the mechanics of CRS applied to tribunals as part of a basic war system, and since pretty much every cabal member is in a tribunal it could create some different opportunities for interaction for cabals too. It could even create a way for the weird Imperial cabal/tribunal structure to actually be a bit of an advantage.
There are also areas that could be given boosts in relation to tribunals/countries that wouldn't actually be major issues as far as balancing goes. Something like holding the standard of countries you're at war with gives an economy boost, or reduces the cost of tribunal abilities. It could feel impactful and relevant to a war effort without feeling necessary enough to declare war all the time just for the benefit.