Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 9:30 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

When should a pantheist priest or knight stop being able to use new spells?
Amateur 9%  9%  [ 2 ]
Initiate (Status Quo) 50%  50%  [ 11 ]
Apprentice 18%  18%  [ 4 ]
Journeyman 23%  23%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 22
Author Message
 Post subject: Clergy spells, religions, and level.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:24 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:12 pm
Posts: 96
Location: Heorot
I think almost anyone who has played a hellion, paladin or priest has experienced the roadblock where you hit initiate and simply can't level effectively any more. Getting to initiate takes a very small amount of time, and even characters who know exactly what religion they want and who have a very active HF are generally kept from grinding through their depressing lowbie levels because of this restriction, if only for a small amount of time.

Mind you though, not everyone has very active HF's in the religion they want, or even know which religion they want. I've seen people who have been kept at a ridiculously low level for upwards of a week because of this.

Perhaps, to be a bit friendlier to those of us trying to level such a character, we should move the spell roadblock to Apprentice or Journeyman?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:44 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:48 pm
Posts: 1608
Location: My heart's in <strike>Iraq</strike> Texas with my newly re-enlisted 'som' 'soq' daughter
SK Character: Galida Apelila Shaloush Mayumi
Status quo is perfectly fine. I remember a GM pantheist hellion who did quite well. Can't remember his name, but he was a well-known harlie. I have leveled a very-weak priest to expert before getting into a religion before. I don't see an issue with a paladin moving forward using skills alone.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:20 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 1:19 pm
Posts: 1896
Seram


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:52 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:29 am
Posts: 753
The only change I have ever wanted seen for this is for priest to get second attack sooner. I had a mid-master paladin without ever having invested spells. I had a priest make it to a level before expert before I was finally invested by an immortal because the HF was never around and someone intervened on my behalf, otherwise, he would have been mentor at least. Hellions get a lot more offensive based skills that don't rely on investment, so I can only assume that they are easier to level than a non-invested paladin who is a lot more reliant on spells.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:12 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 9:03 pm
Posts: 855
Seram was a fine example of a hellion that didnt join a religion. I think he RPd a hellion of Sadr or something and even had a handmade symbol made for him.
He maximised the hellions physical skills, and did very very well.

Although hellions are probably the only religion only class that can be used effectively without a religion.


But I think having to join religion by initiate is fine. It forces the character to RP and get into a faith before you level. When you really don't need any spells over initiate to level anyway until around vet/expert


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 1:05 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 5:21 pm
Posts: 1174
Location: Dänimarka
And had Velshar for most of his life, lets not pretend that didn't make a difference:P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:52 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:27 am
Posts: 5014
Location: Hiding
Benny didn't have spells for a good 10 weeks, and he did fine :O

Any one of those classes can GM without being in a religion, some may take longer than others, but it can be done. Both Paladins and Hellions can be done without religion easily, Priests not so much, but if Jada can get to high mentor without being in a religion on a priest, I'm sure anyone can!(zing)!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:23 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:28 am
Posts: 1538
:(

It's true though. But, it's a slow process. I wouldn't be against giving priests spells up to j-man, just so they have one leveling spell. It's not that big of a deal though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:45 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:08 pm
Posts: 332
josephusmaximus3 wrote:
Seram


Uklamen(i think was his name) gm'd before he picked Alshain as his religion. But I think he was in the fist, so I guess that's not so special after all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 1:15 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:18 am
Posts: 1176
I think priests should go up to jman without a flock.

This gives more time for awesome faith rping, the chance to go through tests quests etc without being f'ed up by the leveling inability.


On the other hand however, after being blemished you should lose the same spells you lose now.

The theory is that the gods are nice with you and give you powers until you devote yourself to one specific god, and once you do, they remove this 'beginner's favor' thing and just watch you walk your path.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 203 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group