Upcoming Updates/Code changes

Rodwen · **Joined:** Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:22 pm **Posts:** 1648

a 'stones' command that acts like the old recall that took you to your home stones. works exactly like recall other than that.

Chem · **Joined:** Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:04 pm **Posts:** 1017

Minotaur's need helmets if they're going to be viable for anything else other than a barbarian. A head shot without a helm is far worse than a leg shot without leg armor. At least Griffon's get toughness naturally.

Le Petit Prince · **Posted:** Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:50 am

^ Absolutely. A second- or third-row minotaur scout or shaman might be viable, but in the end it's a primarily physical race. A minotaur merc is less viable than a gnome merc.

ninja_ardith · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm **Posts:** 4452

jreid_1985 wrote:

I would like to see better benefits in both Hp and Mana trains. Everything else in the game is pretty much satisfactory to me.

Are you kidding me? I played with a mercenary recently that got some absolutely insane regens outside of an inn with hp trains. I also rolled a test character to mana dump in and there are some great results there.

Dayamin · **Posted:** Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:42 pm

The max hp and mp trains are pretty darn good now. I don't see any need to make them anymore powerful.

the_me · **Posted:** Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:05 pm

Did anyone mention the idea of having an offline way to see the who list so you have an idea who to log on as? Just a list with no detects of course.

Deathadder · **Posted:** Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:38 pm

the_me wrote:

Did anyone mention the idea of having an offline way to see the who list so you have an idea who to log on as? Just a list with no detects of course.

I like the idea.

Edoras · **Posted:** Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:00 am

That is an awful idea.

the_me · **Posted:** Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:04 am

Edoras wrote:

That is an awful idea.

Why? It's a simple code change that (as I'd imagine) would merely require a port on the mud server to be opened for the PHP server to talk to, accept a ping or something and return the un-modified (no detect invis/hidden/infravision) call to the 'who' command whenever an 'update' button is pressed on the website (with a script to prevent spam calls for the who list, of course).

I just think it would add a nice little tool to the website that can help people with multiple characters decide who they want to play before they log in, and even give potential new players a glance at some of the acceptable names and titles there can be.

Also probably less work for Dulrik and more for Viltrax setting up the update button and anti-spam script. It's a harmless idea, like it or not.

spammer4life · **Posted:** Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:33 am

the_me wrote:

Edoras wrote:

That is an awful idea.

Why? It's a simple code change that (as I'd imagine) would merely require a port on the mud server to be opened for the PHP server to talk to, accept a ping or something and return the un-modified (no detect invis/hidden/infravision) call to the 'who' command whenever an 'update' button is pressed on the website (with a script to prevent spam calls for the who list, of course).

I just think it would add a nice little tool to the website that can help people with multiple characters decide who they want to play before they log in, and even give potential new players a glance at some of the acceptable names and titles there can be.

Also probably less work for Dulrik and more for Viltrax setting up the update button and anti-spam script. It's a harmless idea, like it or not.

You are making this to hard. Simply make up a new name hit y;y;n;n;y;(password);(password);n;y;(email);(1-4);y;enter;who

Its that easy if you honestly want to decide what character you want to play before logging on.

Shattered Kingdoms

Upcoming Updates/Code changes

Who is online