Disbands

ninja_ardith · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm **Posts:** 4452

haha, that halt lawbreaker line is hilarious.

evena · **Posted:** Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:32 am

Mechanically, an Uxmaln tribunal would be exactly like all the others, and should not happen.

grep · **Joined:** Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm **Posts:** 5522

Just take away banish, pardon, bounty NPCs, and parole, and I don't see why it couldn't be argued? They'd be a tribunal without an autopilot law system -- something I've heard a lot of people say shouldn't be there in the first place.

Besides. It opens up the doors of the Harlequins coming into conflict with whoever wants to try to run the show in Teron, and I think the only way to turn Teron back into the war zone it is supposed to be is to increase the conflict WITHIN the kingdom.

evena · **Posted:** Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:42 am

grep wrote:

Just take away banish, pardon, bounty NPCs, and parole, and . . .

. . . It would be what it already is, a player-run group of mercenaries. The only benefit to it would be CB channel.

Are you suggesting that they should have leadership also? Of whom?

witherwood · **Posted:** Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:43 am

First: Mechanically, there is no difference between having the Ain flag as the Light side, and having the Ain flag as the Dark side (as shown by darkie ainites wearing lighty ain religious armor and vice versa). However, in game, the two are very different. Mechanically, they would act similarly, yes. However, there is one very big difference. There still would be no government, which means no judge. Teron would still be the lawless battleground, it would just give those who live there an option to join a militia that grants them the leadership benefits that every other nation has.

witherwood · **Posted:** Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:45 am

whoops, wrong quote.

witherwood · **Posted:** Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:46 am

evena wrote:

grep wrote:

Just take away banish, pardon, bounty NPCs, and parole, and . . .

. . . It would be what it already is, a player-run group of mercenaries. The only benefit to it would be CB channel.

Are you suggesting that they should have leadership also? Of whom?

I don't see why the Black Rose couldn't put in the effort to have NPCs made that they could use leadership on to help repel attacks.

grep · **Joined:** Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm **Posts:** 5522

lol. Derk and Bill and Afeak and Lathron and the undead angel and the patchwork horror and Archmage Steph and...

Okay, I think I see your point, Evena.

Ain (2012) · **Posted:** Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:55 am

witherwood wrote:

First: Mechanically, there is no difference between having the Ain flag as the Light side, and having the Ain flag as the Dark side (as shown by darkie ainites wearing lighty ain religious armor and vice versa). However, in game, the two are very different. Mechanically, they would act similarly, yes. However, there is one very big difference. There still would be no government, which means no judge. Teron would still be the lawless battleground, it would just give those who live there an option to join a militia that grants them the leadership benefits that every other nation has.

Er...where did this come from? Wherever it came from, it's wrong. There is a mechanical difference between an Ain flag for light side, and an Ain flag for dark side. As for the armor, I've scripted it to accept both sides, but in different ways. That I've done so does not mean there is not a mechanical difference.

grep · **Joined:** Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm **Posts:** 5522

Ain (Eyes)

One look and you're hypnotiiiiized.
He'll take your heart and you must paaaay the priiiice.

:drunk:

Shattered Kingdoms

Disbands

Who is online