Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:46 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 1798
thank you very much for new things


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:02 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:01 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: I'm in a glass case of emotion!
SK Character: Retired Troll
Tragonis wrote:
Valeticia is not a law NPC nor is she orderable.

I think you can use the hellion NPCs to gain access to Valeticia.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:05 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1444
Location: New York
I just tried. No dice. Had the same idea.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:43 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: With a patuty in mah sewty
SK Character: Ivstnesr, Drakey
Lighten load is also used by people who do not hoard. I am glad I did not join a tribunal with my current already, now to rethink what I am going to do (as that spell has many uses and there is not the pbase to always have a heavy armor priest around, or hell unless you are on the dominant side of the mud a priest at all). I believe getting away from NPCs holding spells on PC's is going to be detrimental to tribunals, as of now that is their LARGEST pull. Yes, the addition of a guard is nice, but very limited. If you are going to do away with half of a tribunals benifits, either A. get rid of them, or B. buff the [REDACTED] out of them. Or they will be left sitting there with no one in them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 10:34 am
Posts: 1505
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Dulrik wrote:
Terrus wrote:
Now NPC tribunal priests can no longer lighten load tribunal members unless they worship a heavy armor diety. Was this intentional? Does this mean only certain tribunals can now lighten load as well or was this taken from all? (update Zhenshi priests can still lighten load)

This greatly benefits lighty tribunals since the vast majority of their priests worship Alshain or Dulrik.

Tribunal law NPCs can still cast it if they are of the appropriate religion. However, you should not count on that forever. I am on record as moving the game away from NPCs holding spells for you.


I'm all for that but I don't get your consistency. People join tribunals for 1) Guard NPCs 2) Lighten load and 3) prayer. If you aren't for NPCs holding spells on people then make it so they can't all in one update at least. I can still have NPCs hold prayer, infravision, shield, invis, fly, airy water, armor, sanc, and probably even more I can't even think of right now. It doesn't make sense some tribs can still do lighten load and others cannot if this is your overall goal. Get rid of mages, priests, hellions, and any other class that can hold spells on someone else and you'll achieve your goal, but that is gonna take a lot of work.

Edit: I know this your game and I love it, else I wouldn't have played for 12 years but you need to know some people build their characters around certain things and when you go and uproot those things it tends to not only ruin that persons character but put them in a position to either reroll or quit.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:24 pm
Posts: 483
What sort of combat allows for negation? Is it strictly straight melee, or can reaching weapons, bows and slings, or even MR ignoring spells be considered combat for this purpose?

Is the healing from negation strictly limited to the barb, or does whoever it is that have their affects negated get the healing?

Can things like charms and elementals be negated?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:21 pm 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Terrus wrote:
I'm all for that but I don't get your consistency. People join tribunals for 1) Guard NPCs 2) Lighten load and 3) prayer. If you aren't for NPCs holding spells on people then make it so they can't all in one update at least. I can still have NPCs hold prayer, infravision, shield, invis, fly, airy water, armor, sanc, and probably even more I can't even think of right now. It doesn't make sense some tribs can still do lighten load and others cannot if this is your overall goal. Get rid of mages, priests, hellions, and any other class that can hold spells on someone else and you'll achieve your goal, but that is gonna take a lot of work.

Edit: I know this your game and I love it, else I wouldn't have played for 12 years but you need to know some people build their characters around certain things and when you go and uproot those things it tends to not only ruin that persons character but put them in a position to either reroll or quit.

No, I don't get your consistency. In this post you appear to be criticizing me for making a single spell slightly harder to acquire. But then you recommend that I should immediately remove all casters from being law NPCs. And this is going to do a better job of not ruining a character?

For the record, the lighten load change was not about wimping tribunals - it was about giving the spell to a group that deserved to have it in their repetoir. However, when people complained about it, I did remind you that I am on record as moving the game away from NPCs holding spells for you.

That means I said it before. I said it again now. I will probably say it again in the future. Why do I keep saying this? So that it won't come as a surprise to you as it happens. So that you will not decide to make new characters expecting these abilities to always be available. It means that if I have a reason to make a change, protecting a tribunal "spell" isn't going to factor into the decision.

In the end, we appear to have completely opposite strategies in mind. You are advocating a swift destructive change that really would ruin characters but they would all quit and the wound would be cauterized quickly. I prefer to make changes slowly, and even if some characters get slightly worse over time, they continue to be playable in their lifespan.

But hey, it's not like I'm trying to kill tribunals. That's the other reason I won't just instantly take away all their "spells". Because there has to be something that comes in to replace it. And whatever that is obviously isn't ready yet.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:28 pm 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
zryych wrote:
What sort of combat allows for negation? Is it strictly straight melee, or can reaching weapons, bows and slings, or even MR ignoring spells be considered combat for this purpose?

It's intended to be straight melee (including polearm melee). Ranged weapons and spell casting should not count.

zryych wrote:
Is the healing from negation strictly limited to the barb, or does whoever it is that have their affects negated get the healing?

The barb aborbs the magic as healing, not the original possessor of the magical affect.

zryych wrote:
Can things like charms and elementals be negated?

Charms -- yes, although it's more difficult than ordinary spells. Elementals -- probably not.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:53 am 
Offline
Mortal Contributor

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 6:51 pm
Posts: 962
Location: Nowhere very fast
SK Character: I wish :(
<-- Is more and more encouraged to play a griffarb. Its about time they have a good chance in the melee world.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 04/23/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:06 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 4452
Tragonis wrote:
I hope it will be the same for all tribunals, since lighten load has always been a hoarder's spell.


You wouldn't be saying that if you played an elf merc!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group