Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:38 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Do you approve of this change?
No. It hurts gameplay. 12%  12%  [ 5 ]
No. It makes no freaking sense. 12%  12%  [ 5 ]
No. It hurts gameplay and makes no freaking sense. 24%  24%  [ 10 ]
Yes. It improves gameplay. 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Yes. It makes sense. 24%  24%  [ 10 ]
Yes. It improves gameplay and makes sense, too! 24%  24%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 41
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:41 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Witness Protection
SK Character: Cyndane - Talys
Hey, sorry. You're not top secret enough.

This was a stupid change anyways. Let me explain this very simply.


Guards should attack GUARD NPCs from other countries, not tribunal members. UNLESS they have a GUARD NPC with them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
Mortal Contributor

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 7:41 am
Posts: 1979
Location: Canada
I agree with the guards attacking guards thing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:32 am
Posts: 1097
Location: ima steal your underwears D:<
I disagree with this change, not because it doesn't make sense, but because it unnecessarily limits a tribunal's RP. A "secret agent" should be a viable way of playing a character (and please don't try to say that it's still viable, because it plainly isn't). Attacking opposing guards, however, is perfectly reasonable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:52 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm
Posts: 5522
I had secret agents in the Talon all the time. They were never found out.

Why?

Because they were not inducted.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:58 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:34 am
Posts: 414
grep wrote:
I had secret agents in the Talon all the time. They were never found out.

Why?

Because they were not inducted.

Those aren't secret agents. Those are informants.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:05 am 
Offline
Immortal

Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 8:16 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
SK Character: Achernar
War. Huh.
What is it good for?
Absolutely nuthin.
Say it again.
Yeah Yeah Yeah Yeah.
War. Huh.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:27 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
WickedWitch wrote:
Guards should attack GUARD NPCs from other countries, not tribunal members. UNLESS they have a GUARD NPC with them.


Think about this from a programer's perspective for a second.

The thing they teach you in school when you're studying programming is that your goal is to create streamlined code that requires the absolute minimum of CPU usage at each line.

Now lets assume that your idea is implemented, and a necromancer comes strolling into, say, Menegroth with ten wraiths. He's also got a store-bought pet and, through a wand of charm, Losquaty.

Now, this necromancer passes by two NPCs that are flagged and scripted to check the "loyalty" of all of those NPCs. Those two NPCs also happen to be in the exact same room.

The script fires, and both NPCs check all 12 of those incoming NPCs for "loyalty" flags, causing the CPU to cry bitter tears of overloading. Lag goes up all over the game, due to random numbers of NPCs coming in and going out of all the starting cities, and not just tick lag either. Suddenly, people find random patches of lag. Player tears start flowing as well, now. Oh, and lets not forget the delf necro with 20+ NPCs passing those two scripted NPCs. Maybe then, the game crashes.

Compare that kind of processor drain to the kind of drain generated by just checking the PCs that enter. The difference is massive.

So, in case you can't be bothered to understand why the idea above is bad, let me just emphasize the statement so you can get it.

This is a bad idea.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:45 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:41 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Witness Protection
SK Character: Cyndane - Talys
OA. This whole idea is horrible from a Gameplay PoV. I was just making a suggestion to reduce how horrible it is.

While it makes perfect sense for this to happen, it's going to be detrimental to gameplay, I think. Aren't bounty NPCs enough? If you're going to implement this(which it already has), remove bounty NPCs.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:19 am 
Offline
Immortal

Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 8:16 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
SK Character: Achernar
Actually, bounty NPCs don't seem to be enough at all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:39 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:41 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Witness Protection
SK Character: Cyndane - Talys
When you have a group of like 5+ maybe not.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group