Shattered Kingdoms

Maybe your understanding of what logical means is flawed, but to me "Not given a [REDACTED]" is a pretty valid and logical response to someone when they ask others what their opinion is. I can not help DA that you do not like the argument you got, but insulting everyone because you don't like their argument will not win you any awards here.



I would begin to seriously question YOUR intelligence DA if you are judging others based on a few posts you read of theirs on the internet.



Really? Then answer me this; Why are you bringing all this up in an almost continuing manner towards another argument based around an item you want to use in and the method you want to use it, depend heavily on how Dulrik determines how taunt works, when he already said how he wants the item to work?

It is clearly obvious to everyone here DA that you are just trying, horribly I might add, to trick Dulrik into giving you what you want. Which is that some stupid amulet somewhere in the game, will let you basically WoR in any situation.

Oh and you suck at backhand/off cuff insults.

To make things simple for a [REDACTED] such as yourself, this does involve the necklace cause if you hadn't lost your precious necklace you'd not have made this thread, so do the entire sk pbase a favor and shut the [REDACTED] up and stop QQing like a lil [REDACTED] and move on to another bug you are abusing. For gods sake the pbase is sick and tired of listening to you cry over [REDACTED] items. And yes that's what it all boils down too. And denying just goes to prove what a god damn [REDACTED] liar you are so STFU cry baby!

Yours truely, the rage deleter

Edit: Let alone your lack of respect for the IMMs *note the log you posted* http://sk.[REDACTED].com/show_log.php?feed=723 shows perfect sign that you lack respect for those above you and thus in my opinion Dulrik should throw the book at you.

OK, let me make this simple for you and your limited amount of working brain cells.

I never lost the item. I still have it. Surprised? You shouldn't be.

Anyway, it doesn't work against taunt anymore. Because according to Achernar(who said it was what Dulrik wanted anyway - and he knew that without Dulrik actually commenting to the other thread in bug discussion) when you are taunted you should have no will to get out of combat situation with the taunter(WoR, using the necklace, going in another plane etc).

So if that's what taunt is for Dulrik, we all agree that taunt is bugged. Etherealform and other means to avoid harming the taunter but keeping your [REDACTED] safe are bugs. If so, they must be fixed because believe it or not, half the PCs in the game have access to a way to break out of taunt through a code loophole.

If Dulrik really thinks this is a bug, he can comment here and get this fixed. It's not that hard after all, right? And he could end all that arguing in the first place.

But(and that's a big but), if you are supposed to recite etherealform at will against a swashie to avoid him while taunted, then the item was working perfectly. Actually, word of recall should work perfectly too. I mean if you have the will to cast a spell and avoid the swashbuckler, you can also have the will to pray to a god and gtfo of the swashie's sight and witty remarks. And of course the necklace should work again. In which case, taunt is also broken and should be fixed anyway. Only difference in this case is that I get to laugh at Achernar and other players.

You can choose whatever of these two options you want, both work for me great.

PS: For more information read the log in the link above.
PPS: Oh yeah, and in case Dulrik doesn't reply because he finds this thread not worthy to even write down 5 words, I can only assume that taunt works as intended now. So I guess we go to option two, right?
PPPS: One last thing. I never show disrespect to anyone who doesn't disrespect me first. But I'm no [REDACTED] and no asslicker like some of you to suck up any [REDACTED] that is thrown to me from others. Have fun people.

Now folks that is how you taunt someone into the truth.


See DA, your necklace didn't work. You got taunted and answered with the truth. You couldn't help it. You just had to!!!

Hahaha!!! Learn more about how to argue using a little thing called logic DA.

I still wait to see your argument to just "drop it".

Or am I having any irrational point to my posts? Unlike yourself I mean.

etherealform does not break the affects of taunt.

If you are ethereal, there is no guarantee that you will get away from the swashbuckler. A swashbuckler can keep you there by taunting again when the taunt affect wears off, and in some cases can cause a sorcerer to lose their etherealform.

Nobody buys your arguments and etherealform is not a means of escape from a swashbuckler.

I can, however, tell you how to escape from taunt.

Can you not read? I can point it out line by line, letter by letter even, if you desire such. I just didn't think you wanted that level of humiliation brought upon yourself.

Guess I was wrong.

Ardith, you cannot use the necklace because you have no will to get away from the taunter, but you want to harm him instead. Not because the magic of the necklace is nullified from taunt itself.

You cannot quaff word of recall potions because of the same reason. Not because your god is no longer listening to you because of your enemies words.

To summ all these anyway, you cannot do it because you are so angry from the taunter that you want to fight him, not avoid him.

News flash for you, going into another plane where your attacks pass through the taunter and his pass through you is not exactly that. You are actually avoiding to harm him at will, in a similar way you would quaff word or teleport or anything.

Same applies to a lesser extent to spam casting SS on yourself or something similar, to wait for the taunt duration to pass by and you to gtfo. But especially etherealform, it's exactly the same situation as WoR or teleport or anything.

SK_Phantom, what you are saying makes no sense. Seriously.

Once more, SKers are right on topic.

Thank you for entertaining me.