Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:26 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cabals' inner guardians' gaseous attack
PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 5:35 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 1798
From my own experience/discoveries, all cabal inner guardians 'front load' their blast of gas with highest damage possible whilst it has the most hitpoints, then its damage gradually decrease as its hitpoints lessen (to the point it barely hurts any more).

For the attackers, the very first blast or two usually immediately take out one or two player characters right away, especially for the races particularly weak against poison. Therefore mass healing can barely keep up, everyone spams their healing vials hoping to do as much damage as possible before they hit the ground.

That leads to the mentality of 'zerging', that is, finding as many willing/able raiders as possible so they all pit themselves against this guardian and as long as a few stay alive, they can pickup the corpses/loot within corpses (as well as relic).


Suggestions to allow these guardians to either:

1. Gradually increase their gas blast damage as its hitpoints are being reduced, but appropriately increase the amount of hitpoints it has (this obviously goes against a recent change but please consider), so there is tactics involved as the guardian marvels at defenses -- it is a guardian after all, and allows defenders more time, or

2. Scale the gas blast damage attack appropriately so that it does moderate or averaged damage every strike, with no regard to its hitpoints over the course of its life span, this would in turn allow more relic raids to be possible without calling everyone on the lighty/darkie side to zerg the oppositions' headquarters...

...at which point attackers usually win regardless of defenders, when quantity far outweighs quality, it partially takes the fun away for purpose of the CRS.

m2c


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Cabals' inner guardians' gaseous attack
PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:07 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:08 pm
Posts: 332
Minette wrote:
it partially takes the fun away for purpose of the CRS.


What fun in crs do you speak of?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:09 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
I enjoy the idea of 'ganking' a relic being something difficult and needing a relatively large group of people in order to undertake such a task. That being said, I like your first idea more than the second. In terms of the magnitude in which the gas-blast would hurt, I would prefer (if I was a defender) to see the blast hurt more as the fight went on then the opposite way because 1. healing potions running out, mana's getting spent, more people get a chance to fight before they die, etc.

And I think I must be the only one who likes CRS. :(

Granted, I know that most skers say that things were just 'so super cool' pre-CRS, but I started very soon after it was implemented and have played this game with CRS and never without.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:57 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:26 am
Posts: 1908
Location: Under my covers... sleeping
While I understand what you are saying, Minette, I'm not entirely sure your solution would be better. I think we both agree that the Guardian's gas blast is really it's dominant defense mechanism. If you were to average the damage from gas blast over the course of a battle, you have to pick a number that is higher than the average heal rate of the members involved. This number, I think, would be roughly equal to the second gas blast. If it's much lower, then the ratio of damage received to damaged healed will be less than one, making the attack negligible.

Secondly, I've been in groups of where no one died from the inner guardian. It just takes a lot more preparation and a light tighter of a group. Armor has to be better enchanted, scouts have to have plenty of herbs, etc etc.

Third, remember that a multi-relic guardian will be significantly more powerful. People should die in the raid attempt. :wink: (This comment assumes we're talking about the same raid.) If people don't die, than, IMO, the system is broken.

sleeper


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:57 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:11 am
Posts: 941
Guardians gain strength when they hold more relics?

Neato


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:45 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:47 pm
Posts: 3776
Location: Virginia
SK Character: Amorette
sleeper wrote:
Secondly, I've been in groups of where no one died from the inner guardian. It just takes a lot more preparation and a light tighter of a group. Armor has to be better enchanted, scouts have to have plenty of herbs, etc etc.

sleeper


like necros who get the relic in 20 seconds solo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:51 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1444
Location: New York
I'd like to see some kind of maximum amount of time you can "hold" an enemy cabal's relic. After that time (e.g., 2 months IRL, but make it somewhat randomized) it would revert back to the "owner" guardian and if you wanted it you'd have to gank it again. We could make up some kind of RP reason for this - the energy slowly leaking out while separated or something.

Too often cabals with weak membership cannot regain their relics and this creates an inactivity/disinterest cycle.

Really I'd rather just not have relic ganking remove cabal powers, instead giving some kind of bonus to the victors, but that's a whole other conversation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:26 am
Posts: 1908
Location: Under my covers... sleeping
jhorleb wrote:
Too often cabals with weak membership cannot regain their relics and this creates an inactivity/disinterest cycle.


Why wouldn't the cabal admit defeat, and RP a truce to regain use of their cabal powers?

sleeper

PS Jennbo, the instance I have in mind occurred without any assistance from necros.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:10 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
sleeper wrote:
jhorleb wrote:
Too often cabals with weak membership cannot regain their relics and this creates an inactivity/disinterest cycle.


Why wouldn't the cabal admit defeat, and RP a truce to regain use of their cabal powers?

sleeper

PS Jennbo, the instance I have in mind occurred without any assistance from necros.


You're assuming the cabal holding the relic is willing to accept that. One instance that comes to mind is the Fist and the old Adept relic.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 535
Location: Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter
jhorleb wrote:
Too often cabals with weak membership cannot regain their relics and this creates an inactivity/disinterest cycle.

QFT
jhorleb wrote:
Really I'd rather just not have relic ganking remove cabal powers, instead giving some kind of bonus to the victors, but that's a whole other conversation.

Major agree.

D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group