| Shattered Kingdoms https://shatteredkingdoms.org/forums/ |
|
| Warlocks and Pets https://shatteredkingdoms.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=20591 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Laechlyn [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Warlocks and Pets |
Why can't warlocks have pets, when sorcerors and necromancers can? Is it because warlocks don't need to concentrate on their elementals or what? Just doesn't seem to make any sense to me. |
|
| Author: | Dexity [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
this thread x 50 |
|
| Author: | Dulrik [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-ass that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken. Believe it, or not? |
|
| Author: | the_skaddict [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dulrik wrote: Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.
Believe it, or not? 1 word: Lorzatzu |
|
| Author: | Teh_Peso [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
the_skaddict wrote: Dulrik wrote: Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken. Believe it, or not? 1 word: Lorzatzu Hehe. |
|
| Author: | laeZ1 [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Teh_Peso wrote: the_skaddict wrote: Dulrik wrote: Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken. Believe it, or not? 1 word: Lorzatzu Hehe. I assume Lorzatzu was a character that was a warlock that owned face that was the cause of wimping warlocks. Right? |
|
| Author: | Aust [ Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
laeZ1 wrote: Teh_Peso wrote: the_skaddict wrote: Dulrik wrote: Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken. Believe it, or not? 1 word: Lorzatzu Hehe. I assume Lorzatzu was a character that was a warlock that owned face that was the cause of wimping warlocks. Right? No, but Lorzatu was. |
|
| Author: | Dexity [ Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I remember those days, I actually had a lock back then (my first char never made it to magma lol) but now, they do need help, I am a fairly experienced player and MOST other classes can out PK me. |
|
| Author: | the_skaddict [ Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Aust wrote: laeZ1 wrote: Teh_Peso wrote: the_skaddict wrote: Dulrik wrote: Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken. Believe it, or not? 1 word: Lorzatzu Hehe. I assume Lorzatzu was a character that was a warlock that owned face that was the cause of wimping warlocks. Right? No, but Lorzatu was. Hey, no need to be rude. My bad for mis-spelling a name from around a decade ago... [REDACTED]. |
|
| Author: | ladyjennbo [ Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm probably the only one, but I don't think necros or warlocks or sorcs or Hammer should be able to hold a steed/charm/warlock/undead and a pet. You get one pet, bottom line. -edit- Except necros, obviously, but they shouldn't be able to have a pet and a massive undead army. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|