Shattered Kingdoms
https://shatteredkingdoms.org/forums/

Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?
https://shatteredkingdoms.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=23372
Page 1 of 3

Author:  Achernar [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

As the thread title states, I'm putting this one up for debate. Should there be exits into and out of the city of Teron to the sky and the center of the city respectively?

Author:  Kin [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

I'm torn on this one. The Teron sky exit was good for escape just as it was entrance. It was a double edged sword and well, Teron really isn't supposed to be "safe" like other cities. It's called the City of Chaos for a reason. I guess on this one, I vote yes to keep the sky entrance.

Author:  Superman [ Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

This was a horribly ass-backwards change.

Author:  Terrus [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

I'm torn as well but I voted yes. While I think people should be able to use inns with a bit more safety, I also think Teron is a dangerous city and should keep that element of danger.

Author:  Chem [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

Superman wrote:
This was a horribly ass-backwards change.


Is it actually possible for you to add something constructive to your whining? Why was this horribly ass-backwards? Why should it have been left the way it was? Or even better, provide an alternative plan of action to help fix or modify this change for the better.

Author:  Superman [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

Chem wrote:
Superman wrote:
This was a horribly ass-backwards change.


Is it actually possible for you to add something constructive to your whining? Why was this horribly ass-backwards? Why should it have been left the way it was? Or even better, provide an alternative plan of action to help fix or modify this change for the better.


In an attempt to make cities secure, why would you start with something that isn't even a problem? Sky entrances were not a weak spot, and often are even better defended than the gates. And are certainly nowhere near the threat that being able to gate 2 rooms away from the inn is.

What is so difficult about making Kaiyle, Freydah, Akara, Gusgil, etc no-gate NPCs? That would literally solve 90% of the issue here. But it's still not done.

Why?

Take all the time you want, working on your city-wide super plan. But wow. Just make these NPCs no-gate, please.

Author:  patrisaurus [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

Agreed with Superman on this.

Author:  Edoras [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

Yeah, sky entrances were never a weak spot. It's the dang gate NPCs sitting IN the inn in the north and sitting 2 rooms away from the inn in every other capital that's the problem.

Author:  Achernar [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

Because band aids are for sissies. Aerial entrance to Teron is the debate here. The rest are staying as is. If the changes are going to happen, they're going to happen in one fell swoop. No need for a half done rush job that only makes people go two or three extra rooms away.

Author:  Galactus [ Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Should Teron still have an aerial entrance?

If there was the option, I would have voted for aerial exits but not aerial entrances.

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/