Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Thu Oct 31, 2024 8:36 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Code Update 6/25/2017 Q&A
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:23 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Read the update thread here.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 6/25/2017 Q&A
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:36 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:00 pm
Posts: 2767
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI
SK Character: That one guy who pk'd you.
Is it possible to get a list of races and what their strengths and weaknesses might be?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 6/25/2017 Q&A
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:16 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Even I don't have a command that makes it easy to list that out. I looked through the list and examined a lot of the individual races just now but there are over 75 of them. The main takeaway is that this is a buff for centaurs (and for NPC trolls). It's also a buff for silver or wooden weapons (including fletched arrows) when used against undead.

We may be revising the race list sometime soon to make better use of the vulnerabilities. And instead of one undead race with all these vulnerabilities, there should probably be several (skeletons, wraiths, vampires, etc) and they each have only some of those.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 6/25/2017 Q&A
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:28 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:43 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
SK Character: Pilnor, Surrit, Berr, Rall
Yaaay centaurs aren't totally screwed anymore!

I don't presume you'd be willing to provide any hard numbers or ratios for what a major/normal/minor vulnerability is, would you? Is a major vulnerability going to add twice as much damage, roughly, as a minor vulnerability for example?
If centaur vulnerability to fire hadn't been changed, would it have been viewed as a "major" or "normal" vulnerability under this code update?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 6/25/2017 Q&A
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:59 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
The original vulnerability amount is 'normal'. Minor vulnerability is half of normal vulnerability. Although major vulnerability is not twice that of normal vulnerability, you should take a noticeable amount more damage.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group