Amenhoshet

Achernar · **Posted:** Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:25 pm

To have it to do over again I would have given a leader flag to Amenhoshet. I don't like players attacking players in their own factions. It just doesn't do good for anything. I wish that the player of Issah had found better things to do instead of screwing over the Talon. Yes, he's a hellion. The Talon has a long tradition of allowing hellions in their ranks. The tradition has lasted as long as the Talon itself. Now, the Talon is out two solid characters and nobody feels good about it.

Syndal · **Posted:** Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:35 pm

Somebody needs to make a bamf and become leader of the Talons, and not let the Fist/Hammer(or Imms with crappy ideas) try to push them around.

gork · **Joined:** Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:35 am **Posts:** 200

Well said Archernar. The reason this hellion got the boot was because Issah had a little fit like a 6 year old school girl, and for some reason, got his way. A week later he deleted because he got killed by a NPC. Q F'ing Q. This [REDACTED] was bogus, I had always hoped to see Amenhoset back in after Issah realized he wasn't worth playing.

Well, anyway, It was a shame what happened, It sucked, I'm glad to see one of you go, and I'm sad to see the other one go.

Roll another one, and Have fun.

Forsooth · **Joined:** Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:55 pm **Posts:** 1365

There's nothing wrong with a hellion trying to be a Talon. But he has to expect to lose eventually, given that:

* Talons tend to be lighties or gray (and rarely dogmatic-gray)
* The resident cabal is lightie-only
* The country's culture is strongly biased towards lighties/grays. Look at the temples and see who's on the Council of Blossoms.

While some have been trying to turn Zhenshi more gray, it's perfectly IC for lighties to fight that. Indeed, it'd be breaking character for most not to fight that. And that includes a majority of the Council of Blossoms.

Jardek · **Posted:** Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:08 pm

Dralan wrote:

It's hardly "controversial" he was a Talon. The talons are not lightie, regardless of how predominant lighties are within the Tribunal. I see no reason why a Hellion of ORDER would be a horrible role for them.

Well said.

Erevan wrote:

Its cause you were evil and killed an elf

True or not, this is ridiculous. No wonder nobody wants to play or play with lighties.

Gork wrote:

Issah had a little fit like a 6 year old school girl, and for some reason, got his way. A week later he deleted because he got killed by a NPC. Q F'ing Q. This [REDACTED] was bogus, I had always hoped to see Amenhoset back in after Issah realized he wasn't worth playing.

I hate to agree with Gork, but I agree with Gork.

TheBladeMasta · **Joined:** Mon Nov 15, 2004 9:03 pm **Posts:** 855

I vote we band together and overrun the talon with darkies

Aneira · **Joined:** Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:28 am **Posts:** 1538

TheBladeMasta wrote:

I vote we band together and overrun the talon with darkies

I've been wanting to do this for a while.

Syndal · **Posted:** Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:26 pm

Nobody lasts more than like 2 months in the Talon and remains active. =/

For serious.

Jardek · **Posted:** Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:54 pm

That's because suckim sucks.

(c wut I did thar)

evilpiggies666 · **Joined:** Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:06 pm **Posts:** 315

Mehloncholy wrote:

It is unfortunate that the level of the controversy seemed to rather steamroll the prominent ones involved - Issah and Amenhoset both.

Neither had to go, as far as characters go.(

If you are saying that Issah hadn't to go(as in deletion) you are slightly wrong, Issah and myself both fell Hellions have no right in the Talons, and if the Imms allowed them in then there was no way Issah could handle it and ICly and OOCly It would have killed him to see such. If you read the log I posted Issah felt the Council of Blossoms was using Hellions as slaves and he was against slavery and wanted no part of it. Thus partly why I deleted him, for if I had kept him he'd have gone against the RP I had with him and many wouldn't have liked how he changed.

Khudakh wrote:

I agree, I didn't think it should be controversial. But I think that if lightie did exactly what I did the punishment and reaction would have been a lot less severe. They would have gotten off with just a warning or maybe tarishment. But not being tarnished and then booted while the char in question was offline. Stupid [REDACTED].

I've said it before and I'll say it again, I had no part in your removal, I had wanted you to remain tarnished and a trial to take place, but Sakim gave you the boot after hearing why I tarnished you. So for what it counts I'm sorry you got the boot(specially while offline).

Shattered Kingdoms

Amenhoshet

Who is online