Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sat Dec 28, 2024 12:34 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:42 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:02 pm
Posts: 748
Sorry but a tarnishment doesn't cover saying [REDACTED] like you'll declare war on the hammer, fist and peacekeepers, thats just to detrimental to the tribunals image, depending on if it was actually said. I mean of course, after tarnishing a hellion(class that can justify doing anything), the hellion will have learned his lesson and entirely changed his views on the world.... Or tarnishment means nothing and as soon as he gets leadership he will begin to enact his vision of the talons. Only because I was assured by the Council the Amenhoshet would never get leadership did it make sense to bring him back in.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:17 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:04 am
Posts: 782
Location: Not in the south anymore. Woohoo.
You suck for deleting you bastard...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:34 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:29 am
Posts: 1037
Removing a character from a faction when they are not online should not be allowed. Seriously. How many characters are the staff willing to stand by and watch get destroyed by this tactic?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:35 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:26 am
Posts: 1908
Location: Under my covers... sleeping
suzie9fingers wrote:
Removing a character from a faction when they are not online should not be allowed. Seriously. How many characters are the staff willing to stand by and watch get destroyed by this tactic?


I wouldn't go to that extent. There are a lot of legit reasons to kick people out who are offline. </derail>

sleeper


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:35 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:29 am
Posts: 1037
Rial wrote:
Sorry but a tarnishment doesn't cover saying [REDACTED] like you'll declare war on the hammer, fist and peacekeepers, thats just to detrimental to the tribunals image, depending on if it was actually said.


From what he posted anyway, it sounds like he meant that the Hammer and the Fists would be the ones to break the dipolmacies. That doesn't really sound like a vendetta of war to me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:36 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:29 am
Posts: 1037
sleeper wrote:
suzie9fingers wrote:
Removing a character from a faction when they are not online should not be allowed. Seriously. How many characters are the staff willing to stand by and watch get destroyed by this tactic?


I wouldn't go to that extent. There are a lot of legit reasons to kick people out who are offline. </derail>

sleeper


They can wait until they're online.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:01 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:05 pm
Posts: 769
He acted on information given to him by other lighties. A shame though that the uninduction was done offline... it shouldn't really happen like that.

Issah, I can understand your character's IC disagreement with Amenhoshet being in the Talon, but your OOC frustration is just silly. Your log of RP with the Council of Blossoms explained everything about the situation to you, plain and simple. And there is a difference between being a "dog" and a "slave." A dog is just a derisive term for somebody with unwavering loyalty. So in that way, Amenhoshet would be loyal (as a hellion must) yet the doggedness of it is that he is being used by people who generally dislike him, and who he generally dislikes. However he obviously has his own motivations for being in the Talon. A slave is an entirely different concept, and pretty much just an overdramatization of his situation.



Syndal wrote:
Somebody needs to make a bamf and become leader of the Talons, and not let the Fist/Hammer(or Imms with crappy ideas) try to push them around.


Is it egocentric to feel that directed at me? My character came in under Fist leadership, and with a lightie attitude not archetypal of the Talon. He was then presented with an imm-backed RP to involve that flagging, perpetually undermanned and screwed, boring tribunal with... so he did it. I thought we could all have good fun actually being involved in something. If anything sounded shakey, and it did, I simply assumed there was more to the story. Turns out the story was just as ridiculous as it sounded. Not only that but our Imm bailed. Then everybody left and I get to deal with all the BS. I tried :/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:04 pm 
You did fine. I was referring to every Talon leader. Ever.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:06 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:43 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: With a patuty in mah sewty
SK Character: Ivstnesr, Drakey
suzie9fingers wrote:
Rial wrote:
Sorry but a tarnishment doesn't cover saying [REDACTED] like you'll declare war on the hammer, fist and peacekeepers, thats just to detrimental to the tribunals image, depending on if it was actually said.


From what he posted anyway, it sounds like he meant that the Hammer and the Fists would be the ones to break the dipolmacies. That doesn't really sound like a vendetta of war to me.


Or umm tarnish them so they dont GREATLY benefit some trib/cabal, and uninduct when you next see them WITH some RP, RP is great, and even a uninduction RP can be FUN!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:07 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:43 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: With a patuty in mah sewty
SK Character: Ivstnesr, Drakey
But on Amenhoset, I did like what I saw, all though we were on oposit ends of the field at the end.. Good Rp abilities you have sir.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group