Ardith wrote:
Radamanthys wrote:
But I would not be, on the other hand... allow me to explain:
I did not comment on your RP or your eagerness as players.
I commented on how lame Sadr's spheres are in comparison to Yenko. I -still- declare my disagreement with this change by never even going close to joining Sadr with any of my characters.
Yenko's spheres - Winter, Suffering, Pain
Sadr's spheres - Disease, Suffering, Pain
and WinterLabel me as a [RULES VIOLATION REMOVED], and call me stupid but I don't see how keeping your spheres and adding another one suddenly makes those same spheres lame.
Nevermind, I just realized it was because of some arbitrary [REDACTED] that you just made up to how you picture both goddesses. The only thing I can agree upon is hellions. They were a staple of the religion from the beginning and then they just disappeared with the snap of a finger.
Thanks, Ardith. You said exactly what I was thinking when I read his post. If he really wants to hold this bias, I won't hold it against him. However, if he really wants to experience the faith and what it has become, he should interact with us from the standpoint of wanting to learn about it.
Radamanthys wrote:
Yenko was "clean". Her suffering was a thing of purity. Sadr's purity is disease. She was also coldly beautiful, while Sadr is an ugly witch. She was also honorable, while Sadr is not. Sadr doesn't really have Winter or Frost as her spheres, even if someone chooses to remember Yenko did IC and pay homage.
I too miss the hellions, but I still hold the faith to the standards of the code laid out in the books if they choose a warrior path.
Also, I would find it really amusing if you tried to call Sadr this ICly, just to see what she would do to you.