Shattered Kingdoms

the way the input is compiled, there is a chance for error. If you only take the highest scoring on each thread you may be overlooking something. You would do better adding the number fo votes something got from all three threads. and taking the top three. Something may have been relatively high for first pick, second, and third but not the top in either. Adding them all together would reveal it to be extrmely wanted.

I voted dual membership.

I voted for Religion Specific Spells. I like the idea a lot, like anything that draws power and attention from cabals and adds to faiths and other, more neglected stuff.

I didn't vote for any. There are some smaller things that could be added first that will add a bit to the game that won't take as much time as some of the choices and shouldn't be put off because they are considered minor.

Such as...

Dual membership, meaing haveing two charectors, both in Tribs and Cabals? If so that is why I voted it. But cant some new rp stuff be inplimited easily? Pmote and Smote..?

Dual membership would be have one char in a trib AND a Cabal

Who cares about Mc? They're the perfect example of dual membership IMHO, without actually being two groups.

Its harlequins I'm looking at. They're the only cabal that doesn't have a tribunal counterpart, so it would suck for them. But given their rp, I don't think they'd have a problem.

I'm just entirely against dual membership. You should only have to pick one. Two is just a bit too much. Your loyalties go astray and such.

Specifically, voice adjectives/asay. Not everyone should sound exactly the same and it annoys the hell out of me.

voice (adjective) would be used for being blind/dirted/dark room/all yells regardless.

asay for being able to talk with emotion in the say rather than the *angrily" in it or an emote that is 4 lines too late to make much sense to the current conversation.

Kilia, you are in the tiny, tiny, tiny minority. Besides which, you shouldn't be limited to joining only the 'corresponding' cabal with your tribunal, or vice versa. In fact, I seem to recall massive schisms between the peacekeepers and the Hammer, for instance, and it might be a wiser decision (especially bearing in mind the game's intent to have cabals as global organisations) for a cabal member to choose a tribunal not necessarily to do with their country.

That way you could also actually have adepts infiltrating other countries with their evil, and jazz like that.