Muktar wrote:
Paladin: More HP, Better Armor, Same Protective spells(not counting SA since it doesn't stack with xxx), better weapons, more attacks, no maledictions, better in combat damaging spells.
Have you ever, EVER tried facing a shaman with a paladin? Good luck beating heal with cure critical/serious. Also, paladins can't bash. Shamans can. In addition, shamans can be giants and ACTUALLY bash. Having read your little comparison, I can say that your theory about paladins being able to beat shamans 1v1 is garbage. I have extensive experience with both classes, and unless this new change is a whole lot more [REDACTED] than even you're suggesting, the shaman will
wipe the floor with the paladin.
Quote:
light armor priest: Same hp, Same or better armor(scale w/MV), Same or better protective spells(depending on circumstance), worse weapons, same attacks, no maledictions, better in combat damaging spells.
hvy armor priest: Better armor, rest is the same.
Stop saying they're better in combat damaging spells! Harm is great and all, so is SoF if it's relevant, but good luck getting either of them off if you've just been spirit horded. Bash > spells. Priests lose this fight savagely.
Quote:
Okay, the paladin only sucks compared to the shaman because he doesn't have maledictions.
Wrong, as discussed above.
Quote:
The rest the pallie is generally better or the same at least. Paladins are better tanks.
Wrong, as discussed above.
______________________
Those of you talking about bog and [REDACTED], that's great, but I'm not really discussing who is better in special situations.