Dark-Avenger wrote:
Then you first wimp cabal4, then cabal3, then buff cabal1.
In the tribunal case, GoA > Keepers > Hand > Talons.
You people whine about the wrong tribunal. If you are to QQ about something, learn to QQ about something right.
I think that was entirely implicit in my post. Instead of assuming that I'm whining because I don't appear to step into line behind you, perhaps you should stick to the argument at hand.
I'm not in any of these cabals. I have no bias and no reason to make sure one or another gets nerfect or stays the same. Ultimately, I only care about this argument so far as it goes in terms of game balance.
Your post suggested that since one cabal is more overpowered than another overpowered cabal that something only needed to be done with the most overpowered cabal. That's obviously wrong, and since you're pushing away from that argument, I'll back off it.
But the fact is that many other people believe that your cabal does not set a standard for appropriate like you seem to believe it does, tells you that you should take an step back, give cabal-to-cabal dynamics a much more objective look instead of dismissing it out of hand. I'm going to assume that you're not some totally arrogant tool that believes his own opinion is automatically better than everyone else's, despite some evidence to the contrary in the form of that ridiculous "whining" comment.