Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 9:05 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:08 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:54 pm
Posts: 2765
Location: Pyrgos, Greece
Didn't griffons and sprites got a HUGE buff in the last code update where the accuracy penalty of magical flight was introduced?

That goes past the obvious accuracy penalty, it goes down to trip, track etc etc.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:49 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:55 pm
Posts: 1365
It's been a long time since I played a griffon, and it'll be quite a bit longer. (Fun RP race, but I want to try some roles and mechanics that griffons can't do.) Combine that with very limited activity, and I'm sure I'm out of date on their power level. But I'd view griffons this way:

* Jardek's quite right, in that griffons die a lot and are meant to played aggressively in spite of that. My concern is that they have the offense to be a serious threat before they die, so those deaths don't seem pointless. That is something I've felt with most classes, though I should note I'm not very skilled. I'm especially worried about griffon barbarians, because it can look like a sensible combination to newbies.

* When people talk about griffon toughness and saves being so great, it makes me wonder if they've actually played one. Griffons don't have good wisdom; they're quite vulnerable to willpower spells. Griffon constitution gives a good fortitude save, but not enough extra HP to make up for all the damage they take from spell attacks or elemental weapons. Toughness doesn't compete with good armor, or even storebought heavy armor. Griffons really are fragile. As mentioned above, that's not a tragedy, but to talk as if they were strong here seems odd.

* I have to snicker just a bit when this is called a huge buff. Last I heard, reflex was still the enchantment that everyone hated. And unless they were monks, leveled griffons only used claws when their regular weapons were ineffective. Unless Fist griffons got to combine claw and cabal powers again, it's hard for me to understand some of the vehemence.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:18 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 2637
Location: Floating in Previous Player Ether
Aerial combat already exists in that griffons and sprites can fly and fight without getting a to-hit penalty. No other race can.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:31 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:52 am
Posts: 1273
Location: Dark side of the moon
Inzy wrote:
Travorn wrote:
Sure, if something like this were added:

Aim mid

You hack a wing off of a burly male griffon and he falls to the ground.


AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ADD THIS
ADD THIS


Holy [REDACTED], I thought the exact same thing when I read the first post. That should definitely be added, for sprites too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 3:56 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 8:08 am
Posts: 1232
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
I agree, that would be so awesome people would go blind from it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:53 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:06 am
Posts: 719
Forsooth wrote:
It's been a long time since I played a griffon, and it'll be quite a bit longer. (Fun RP race, but I want to try some roles and mechanics that griffons can't do.) Combine that with very limited activity, and I'm sure I'm out of date on their power level. But I'd view griffons this way:

* Jardek's quite right, in that griffons die a lot and are meant to played aggressively in spite of that. My concern is that they have the offense to be a serious threat before they die, so those deaths don't seem pointless. That is something I've felt with most classes, though I should note I'm not very skilled. I'm especially worried about griffon barbarians, because it can look like a sensible combination to newbies.

* When people talk about griffon toughness and saves being so great, it makes me wonder if they've actually played one. Griffons don't have good wisdom; they're quite vulnerable to willpower spells. Griffon constitution gives a good fortitude save, but not enough extra HP to make up for all the damage they take from spell attacks or elemental weapons. Toughness doesn't compete with good armor, or even storebought heavy armor. Griffons really are fragile. As mentioned above, that's not a tragedy, but to talk as if they were strong here seems odd.

* I have to snicker just a bit when this is called a huge buff. Last I heard, reflex was still the enchantment that everyone hated. And unless they were monks, leveled griffons only used claws when their regular weapons were ineffective. Unless Fist griffons got to combine claw and cabal powers again, it's hard for me to understand some of the vehemence.


I'm probably the single biggest supporter of Griffons in the modern SK era, and I played along side most of the griffons that were around pre-att/toughness boosts. Myself and Mira helped come up with toughness. With all of this said I can say from a position of authority that griffons, while not the best race in the world, are far from the worst. Toughness is a lot better than you believe it is, and until code changes were put in specifically affecting heavy armor, toughness was just as good and still isn't horribly worse. Toughness is still better AC wise than most heavy armor, and all light armor except perhaps dragonhide, I wouldn't know. The only thing you're missing out on is enchant slots and the "heavy armor bonus". You're not going to get the heavy armor bonus for multiple reasons, one of which is that it'd be idiotic. So if you're that worried about campaigning for a griffon boost I'd choose a different tact altogether than the one you posted not too long ago.

Forsooth wrote:
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:36 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry that this post on griffon power-ups is a bit off-topic, but it is a hot-button of mine. Feel free to skip over if you aren't interested.

Personally, I don't mind that griffons are fragile. How would you expect a contest between fur-and-feathers and the best magical crafting to go? It's just that they need some different ways to make a positive contribution. If programming changes could be made by a wish, I'd make three changes to their innates. (Besides fixing resistances, that is.)

First, I'd slightly improve their claws and hide at Master+. Griffons don't need heaps of free MP, but they should have some natural defense against trivial stuff like kick. (My griffons often took more damage from the naga tail sweeps in the demon city than from the normal attacks.) Also, griffons who sacrifice reaching weapons could use a little more combat-damage as reward.

Second, I'd create a new innate "Read Magic". This would let griffons use scrolls of no more than half their level, or provide a modest bonus to the scroll and scribe skills if they have them. The idea is to give griffons more defensive/utility prep opportunities. (Some increased power has to be prep-dependent, or lazy players like me will never play anything else.) I doubt that 25th-level scrolls will be PK-effective offensively. If I'm wrong, we could always tone this down more.

Third, I'd create a new innate "Flight Mastery". This would give griffons bonuses while in the air, weighted toward high-levels. I'd look at minor bonuses to dodge, and huge bonuses to reflex. (No griffon can afford to load up on reflex.) I'd also reduce their movement lag while flying, so they actually get something for the PE they spend on natural flight. Finally, this would give only heavy-armor griffons a "dive" attack for some extra damage when unarmed. Griffons get little from heavy-armor otherwise. This might make griffon barbarian and battlepriest players feel less foolish, anyway.

I think this is a good picture of griffons: mentally capable, good feral fighters, and superior mounts - all while retaining a sensible fragility in a world of magicans and metal-users. YMMV.


And my response, which still stands.

Griffons don't need much, if anything, but if you wanted to give them a few positive non game breaking tweaks.

1. Make their bonuses to Ref/Fort/Will from stats be somewhere around 2x to 3x of other races, it allows them to take advantage of their high stat line and extra stat points even for classes that don't use all of their stats and keeps their unique eqlessness.

2. Get rid of all of their random acid/cold resists, keep the poison immunity, and just give them the magic resistance every other magical race has like sprites/halflings.

3. A racial damage bonus to hand to hand stacking with anything and everything that uses hand to hand dependant on level wouldn't be horrible.

Any one of these would be something griffon players appreciated, any two would hopefully be enough to shut people up for a good long while, all three would be more than enough and would likely push griffons to around half-elf levels.

The only other thing I could suggest is an across the board boost to the amount of HP CON gives players, this would help most races, but griffons would get a bit larger boost than most because of their need for higher hp pools.


Last edited by Sklz711 on Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:57 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
Sklz711 wrote:

I'm probably the single biggest supporter of Griffons in the modern SK era,


Nope. I officially claim that title.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:06 am
Posts: 719
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
Sklz711 wrote:

I'm probably the single biggest supporter of Griffons in the modern SK era,


Nope. I officially claim that title.


Like most things you claim, you can do so all you want, and I'll just laugh.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:07 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:55 pm
Posts: 1365
I appreciate the thoughtful comments, Sklz711, and you're absolutely right that if I were looking to balance griffons, aerial combat bonuses are the wrong path. But that's not my objective now.

Dulrik hasn't had much interest in balancing griffons, and it rather makes sense. Take a fun RP race that requires little prep time, make it competitive in power, and you'll start seeing a griffon on every hill. It's not good for the gameworld. I'm looking instead at making griffons a more fun and distinct experience. This goal might actually make The List.

You see, I had a revelation while playing my last griffon, a warlock. He was still on the weak side; one sleep staff pretty much turned him into a big, ready-to-carve turkey. But unlike my other griffons, he could really do things besides open his beak. He may have died more often than a human, but I had the feeling his efforts had a chance. That's key to making griffons a good experience mechanically. And unfortunately, it's not an experience I've had with any other griffon class.

There's something deeply wrong that griffons are so inept physically. Part of the fun of a griffon ought to be playing the monster a little bit. Instead, their only decent classes tap away with polemaces and similar junk. Bleah. So this idea was focused on making griffons more physical, with a skill that suits their nature well. And it also gives them a tactical choice in their speed, to help compensate for limited weapon selection.

Sure, willpower and fortitude bonuses would help more than reflex. But reflex will help griffons deal with those darn element-spitting NPCs in high-level zones, letting them do more. And it's also modest enough a PK help that it might actually happen.

I agree that griffons are never going to get heavy armor; that'd be insane on a griffon warlock. But that means griffon barbarians really need some help, if they're not going to approach the futility of giant warlocks. My chief concern about my proposal is not helping them enough. Perhaps the spear/polearm damage bonus should be bigger than the claw bonus....


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:34 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:56 pm
Posts: 764
Location: Somewhere
Inzy wrote:
Travorn wrote:
Sure, if something like this were added:

Aim mid

You hack a wing off of a burly male griffon and he falls to the ground.


AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ADD THIS
ADD THIS


Forever a deep-elf. :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 163 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group