Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 7:39 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 18  Next

Is aura of negation dumb?
Aura of negation is dumb. 48%  48%  [ 20 ]
Aura of negation is not dumb. 52%  52%  [ 22 ]
Total votes : 42
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 7:30 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 2323
SK Character: Airkli
If stance doesn't affect the amount of HP earned from a resist, it should. Mood defensive obviously earning the barb more HP. This would fix the undeniable truth that MRbarbs are still squishy compared to non-mr melee classes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:25 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:41 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Witness Protection
SK Character: Cyndane - Talys
The griffon race is pretty dumb.

The problem is clearly griffons, and not AoN. I don't see any logs of human barbs using AoN.

Anything that can run around naked and be 97% as effective as they would be fully equipped is silly.

In fact, you are actually more effective when you don't have to give a crap about dying, because you will do things more cautious people won't.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 4452
You're more effective at dying. Sure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:44 pm 
Offline
Mortal Contributor

Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1279
Location: Miami, FL
WickedWitch wrote:
Anything that can run around naked and be 97% as effective as they would be fully equipped is silly.


And for someone who has less time to spend doing the full-equip dance, it's a legitimate and fun way to enjoy the game. Leave it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:43 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
SK Character: Pilnor, Surrit, Berr, Rall
Except that said person has no reason not to junk other players every chance he gets. It isn't like he needs normal armor.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:44 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 4452
You can junk people without aura of negation. How is this a strength for it?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1444
Location: New York
nothingxs wrote:
WickedWitch wrote:
Anything that can run around naked and be 97% as effective as they would be fully equipped is silly.


And for someone who has less time to spend doing the full-equip dance, it's a legitimate and fun way to enjoy the game. Leave it.


I agree this option should be left in principle. It's just that the character should just have less upside potential with zero prep than another character with a lot of prep. Between 100% MR possibility now, some new cabal options, and AoN, a character with no preparation can come pretty close to matching a fully-prepped, decked out character.

It just needs some tweaking downwards. One thing that should be changed is the relative effectiveness of AoN to allow for an easier "saving throw."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:00 pm 
Offline
Mortal Contributor

Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1279
Location: Miami, FL
Edoras wrote:
Except that said person has no reason not to junk other players every chance he gets. It isn't like he needs normal armor.


Wow. In the world of nonarguments, this is king.

jhorleb wrote:
I agree this option should be left in principle. It's just that the character should just have less upside potential with zero prep than another character with a lot of prep. Between 100% MR possibility now, some new cabal options, and AoN, a character with no preparation can come pretty close to matching a fully-prepped, decked out character.

It just needs some tweaking downwards. One thing that should be changed is the relative effectiveness of AoN to allow for an easier "saving throw."


I think that, considering all the things you lose out on for focusing on magic resistance, it's pretty fair that they can just up and at 'em. They will be mostly effective until someone puts in a little prep, though (back row, etc).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:57 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:43 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
SK Character: Pilnor, Surrit, Berr, Rall
nothingxs wrote:
Edoras wrote:
Except that said person has no reason not to junk other players every chance he gets. It isn't like he needs normal armor.



Wow. In the world of nonarguments, this is king.
Why? The MR changes had close to zero effect on PvE, and was almost entirely aimed towards PvP. How is the impact that this has on other characters not worth considering?

Your argument was "For some people it's a legitimate and fun way to enjoy the game," but that can be applied to anything. If warlocks were given the slay command, people would whine, even though warlocks would find it totally awesome.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:04 am 
Offline
Mortal Contributor

Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1279
Location: Miami, FL
Edoras wrote:
nothingxs wrote:
Edoras wrote:
Except that said person has no reason not to junk other players every chance he gets. It isn't like he needs normal armor.


Wow. In the world of nonarguments, this is king.
Why? The MR changes had close to zero effect on PvE, and was almost entirely aimed towards PvP. How is the impact that this has on other characters not worth considering?

Your argument was "For some people it's a legitimate and fun way to enjoy the game," but that can be applied to anything. If warlocks were given the slay command, people would whine, even though warlocks would find it totally awesome.


Is this the equivalent to giving griffon barbarians the slay command? All players always had a good reason to always full junk/loot you. The only difference is the barbarians will likely be sharing the stuff with other players or junking more of it. Nonargument.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group