Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 7:28 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 18  Next

Is aura of negation dumb?
Aura of negation is dumb. 48%  48%  [ 20 ]
Aura of negation is not dumb. 52%  52%  [ 22 ]
Total votes : 42
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:58 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Spokane, WA
I would say that then you would need to find a different way of attacking groups that contain 2nd row griffarbs. There are spells that ignore MR so therefore, those classes should always nuke griffarbs at their first chance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:42 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:43 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
SK Character: Pilnor, Surrit, Berr, Rall
Casting a flat-damage spell at the class with the highest HP in the game isn't a really good game plan.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Edoras wrote:
As things currently stand, having a griffbarb in the second rank spamming AoN on PCs is one of the best formations in PvP.

AoN can't be spammed "on" anyone directly. You have to be in melee with the target for AoN to trigger. If the barb is in the second row, he needs a reach weapon in order to affect any opponent with his AoN.

How is this any different than any other barbarian? The class has always been better at dishing out damage than taking it, so it's probably correct to put ANY barbarian in the second rank if you have someone better at tanking in your group.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:49 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Edoras wrote:
Casting a flat-damage spell at the class with the highest HP in the game isn't a really good game plan.

You insist on making a distinction between MR barbs and regular barbs, therefore it's incorrect to not do the same here. MR barbs are NOT going to have the highest HP in the game, because they spent 10 trains on MR instead.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:04 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:59 am
Posts: 755
AoN should have the side affect of hitting ones own group especially if second rank.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:06 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:43 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
SK Character: Pilnor, Surrit, Berr, Rall
Dulrik wrote:
MR barbs are NOT going to have the highest HP in the game, because they spent 10 trains on MR instead.
Griffon barbs can max both.

Dulrik wrote:
How is this any different than any other barbarian? The class has always been better at dishing out damage than taking it, so it's probably correct to put ANY barbarian in the second rank if you have someone better at tanking in your group.


Because the best buffed up barb in the game won't be able to cancel buffs from the enemy: If I was looking to do damage to someone and I was able to choose between having giant strength and haste myself versus being able to strip away sanc, armor, shield, giant strength, haste and SA/Protection from my target, I would gladly choose the latter. I would -much- rather have an MR barb putting AoN up on my target with auto assist than a normal barb who pumped out a little more damage.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 4452
When vets come and QQ about a new ability that perhaps threatens their perceived ability to always win, you know you're doing something right.

This whole reduction to griffarb really tells a lot about the strength of the arguments the opposition has, which is to say, none at all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:37 pm 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:58 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Spokane, WA
Crap, I actually agree with Ardith... *looks around to see if the world is blowing up*

The only argument I can say about mr barbs that have reach weapons is this, maybe AoN for melee attacks only work on the attack if they are in the front row. If they are in the second row, it is required for the other side to attack with a melee. *If* there was going to be any balancing done.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:00 pm
Posts: 2767
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI
SK Character: That one guy who pk'd you.
I have nothing against the ability, just its effectiveness. 100% magical resistance is too much and the saving throw for AoN is almost none existence.

Ardith also likes to make arguments when the outcome favors him.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aura of negation
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
Mortal Contributor

Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 1279
Location: Miami, FL
ninja_ardith wrote:
When vets come and QQ about a new ability that perhaps threatens their perceived ability to always win, you know you're doing something right.

This whole reduction to griffarb really tells a lot about the strength of the arguments the opposition has, which is to say, none at all.


Like retreat?!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group