jerinx wrote:
Edoras wrote:
I'm trying to compare tribunals to each other, and you just brought in cabal skills. They aren't all that related when dealing with NPC buffs.
Unfortunately, they are. The argument is the EXACT same: this other player organization gets access to this spell, but I don't. It's unbalanced and I want it.
I'm sure MC wants access to [Hammer of Light cabal]'s spell and would trade, say [Midnight Council cabal skill] to get it. Tough cookies, I'm afraid. You can make this case to your KD based on the spells you have access to, and I'm sure there's an argument to be made...maybe. But in the end, it seems a pretty fickle argument to make. Not every tribunal should have the exact selection of buffs.
Except that every tribunal -does- have access to the exact same set of buffs at various levels, except for lighten load since the lighten load change. Why? Because of a side effect to the spell itself being changed. Is that unbalancing? Heck yes. Lighten load is sick.
The coded advantages to joining a trib are two-fold: the guard NPCs, and the buffs. If you change what buffs can be held, you severely alter the benefit of joining that tribunal. If you think that the Talon deserved a buff to their trib, then that's fine, but I disagree. Talon were fine way before before everyone else lost lighten load. Now, they get it for free whereas everyone else has to have a heavy armor priest friend. It's never come up in the forums before, either, and is worth bringing to Dulrik's attention.
As well, brewing lighten load is horrible compared to having it held on you 24/7. They're not even close to the same. A lighten load vial lasts a matter of minutes. If your response to this is "Make friends with a heavy armor priest," then I agree with you: The Talon should not be the only exception to this rule.