Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:28 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:08 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 11:51 am
Posts: 1500
I agree and like I said I wouldn't join a tribunal unless I was GM. Doesn't mean that it jives with Dulrik's stated goal, though. I dislike tribunal affiliation showing up on the who list for an entirely different reason.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:37 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 2323
SK Character: Airkli
GMing is easy enough. Why is it an issue?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:43 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 11:51 am
Posts: 1500
The bandwagon effect - gave my theory a few pages back, if you're really interested why I don't like it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:57 pm 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Just a warning: This is not GD. Any more flaming will result in the issuance of temporary bans.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:59 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:32 am
Posts: 1097
Location: ima steal your underwears D:<
Would it be possible to give lower-level characters--say, expert and below--the option to hide their tribunal flag?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:02 am 
Offline
TMS Cheerleader

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:01 am
Posts: 1302
Location: BFE Arkansas
SK Character: Addison
I know that player courtesy is a...lame excuse. But still I don't see a problem with them being flagged and joined at such a low level. If they hear bounty NPCs yelling out they run away and hide...besides they should be training anyway. And if they feel that they can defend then they have that choice.

My 2 cents.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:27 am
Posts: 5014
Location: Hiding
They also can't enter opposing cities they are at war with w/o being attacked by guards.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:00 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 606
SK Character: Caric
My thoughts on tribunal flags being publicly displayed.
Its confuses the who list. When flags where installed at only noticeable to people in your faction it was reasonably clear what they meant. You had a flag other people had the same flag clearly similar affiliation be it religion/faction. Having the whole who list cluttered with flags make it well cluttered.

Bandwagon syndrome is an issue. It already is an issue with out the flags. It does remain to be seen what the player base has done but given past efforts I do not have high hopes for those not on the bandwagon.

I am worried it will promote lack of RP. X is of a faction we are at war with lets kill them already happens. With publicly displayed tags random ganking because of tribunal membership is more accessible and justifiable. Now although this is acceptable RP it really seems like the bottom of the barrel. It doesn't feel like something we should be promoting.

For those of you who think you shouldnt join a tribunal before GM, it might be unwise to do so but there are plenty of IC reasons to want to defend your city or help out your friends defending a city. Just the same as there are RPs where someone doesnt feel the need to drop everything and defend the nation from someone walking around getting attacked by bounty NPCs in the wilderness.

I can see reasons behind trying to share this information. Knowing who your allies are to ask for help is a good thing. The problem I see is the ability to get knowledge is limited by the code already in place. There just isnt any spy code where you could find out information about people you are at war with. There isnt any share code where you let your allies know who is and isnt a member of your tribunal. The result is what we have. It just feels like my ruling body sold me out to the world and hung me out to dry. It may or may not still feel as stupid after a generation swap but right now it feels totally out of place. I would rather have the information only internally known and as you find out information on people your it ICly generating RP interactions.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:12 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:05 am
Posts: 333
Location: Newbtown
Cordance wrote:
Having the whole who list cluttered with flags make it well cluttered.

I do agree with you here. Aesthetically, I don't like the changes because I feel like the who list has been overrun by flags. I don't understand the point of the religion flag being visible at all. 'Who religion' is sufficient; you don't really need that information in your face. I have found flag and channel overload off-putting as a newbie on other MUDs, but I may just have flag hypersensitivity.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 07/06/2013 Q&A
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:52 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:21 pm
Posts: 906
For tribs maybe a new rank should be added between 0 and 1. Call it Trainee. As a Trainee your flag won't be public until you reach champ(maybe even as low as Master). This will allow people to train while still in one but the flag won't be so public unless they are promoted. Nerfs to the trainee could be something like, unable to recruit and/or order but still would have law immunity. RP reason why would be because the other officers are actually higher status than the trainee.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group