Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:04 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:40 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:18 pm
Posts: 1704
1. Mercenary
2. Priest
3. Barbarian
4. Warlock
5. Sorcerer
6. Shaman
7. Necromancer
8. Paladin
9. Hellion
10. Bard
11. Scout
12. Swashbuckler
13. Rogue

Most important factors influencing pve ability:

1) Soloing
2) Large group
3) Small group
4) Travel spells
5) Locating


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:45 am 
Offline
Immortal

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:26 am
Posts: 423
It has been my observation that the vast majority of the most successful PvE characters for a long time have been grey aura. This seems to be the single most important factor for PvE success, far eclipsing class. The common sense argument is that this is because of their flexibility in grouping up. The asymmetry they have with the protection spell also helps them here. Given that, I would say the worst classes for PvE are hellion, necromancer, and paladin. The worst races are elf, deep-elf, and griffon. This is purely the result of logistics, not game mechanics.

The counter to this is that there are more items that can only be obtained by good or evil characters than neutral characters, but I don't know if it is successful in achieving balance on this front.

My vote for the best overall is probably priest, because they can pair with the majority of other classes to be effective, they can gate, consecrate at the point of equipment acquisition, and they can resurrect party members in the case of partial party kills. Their only major weakness is solo PvE, but a resourceful priest can be decent at that, too. Just my personal opinion, and I won't begrudge people for saying mercenary or warlock or even sorcerer is better.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:55 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2015 4:49 pm
Posts: 229
I won't do a lot of end-game material without a priest, unless it's a quick trip to the grey wastes. I certainly believe priests are the most PvE-useful class in the game. I sometimes miss playing one, but then I remember the insanely long line of people wanting brewing and consecrations done, and then I remember that I'm glad I don't have one. Still, game seems to be a bit short on priests lately.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 1:19 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:00 pm
Posts: 2767
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI
SK Character: That one guy who pk'd you.
I am going to necro this thread since I feel swashies are pretty [REDACTED] still. So much so that I haven't even seen a long played swash in ages. I think giving swashies evasion would be a good start, maybe even streetwise. Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 12:18 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 1068
Location: Probably Camping Losache
SK Character: Arkex, Chronis, Azoreth, Kyln
Tragonis wrote:
I am going to necro this thread since I feel swashies are pretty [REDACTED] still. So much so that I haven't even seen a long played swash in ages. I think giving swashies evasion would be a good start, maybe even streetwise. Thoughts?


At a glance, I’d support it. But I’d need to think about how their abilities can break the class.
Evasion wouldn’t really help them in melee vs melee, would it? It would just make them less vulnerable to spell casters. Right? It’s a decent place to start maybe.
But I think their big issue is that they can’t tank, and they’re supposed to be a front row fighter.
So wouldn’t it be more beneficial to allow them to eparry against bare hands and massive weapons?
I’d like to be able to grab a swash and run out to the dreamscape without having to worry about them being squishy.

I think streetwise is still too OP, so I’m hesitant to give it to other classes. But giving a swash streetwise would also be just another “incentive to play a swash” without fixing the overall issue about the class.
I think there should be more ways to defend against streetwise. Invis/hidden perhaps. Perhaps NPCs have to be able to see in the dark if the player is in the dark?
Maybe give a nat 20 Roll where someone could see past these. But someone would need to pay over and over again to get a location on someone that falls under these categories.
Also, buff the scry crystal ball if locating players is super easy now.

But main point: evasion could be cool. But make swashbucklers less squishy.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 12:00 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:22 pm
Posts: 455
Playing with the different NPCs I can find. Swashbucklers are only useful where weapons are involved. Otherwise you just grab a barbarian. I have yet to find a GM merc to charm. Swashbucklers are useless PVE, like more than sorc are.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 6:09 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 1068
Location: Probably Camping Losache
SK Character: Arkex, Chronis, Azoreth, Kyln
TheX wrote:
Playing with the different NPCs I can find. Swashbucklers are only useful where weapons are involved. Otherwise you just grab a barbarian. I have yet to find a GM merc to charm. Swashbucklers are useless PVE, like more than sorc are.


Hence the ability to parry all types of melee attacks, yeah?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: PvE: Rank the classes in terms of utility
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:02 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:22 pm
Posts: 455
No, I think there should be a boosted dodge for those attacks. There is less reach on empty hand attacks and slower attacks with massives, it should allow the swashbuckler to move out of the attack faster. If you boost the parry then they get access to more of their skills. I have thought from the get go they should have some form of enhanced dodge for these situations.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group