Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:36 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Should warriors receive a weapons spec from aging.
Yes. They should receive a weapon spec. 72%  72%  [ 23 ]
No. They should not receive a weapon spec. 28%  28%  [ 9 ]
Total votes : 32
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:43 pm 
Some of these ideas sound good, but as far as spellcasters go, isn't the increase in their main stats enough? I think this was started because warriors just get worse with time. And there's not much incentive besides RP to keep a fighter char around for a while..I mean it's not really necessary or anything, but if there was something, perhaps people would keep characters for longer than a few months.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:48 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Boston, USA
SK Character: Sorel
I would agree that giving other classes spec would devalue the skill in the hands of mercs, since more specs are not necessarily all that useful (most of the longer lived chars get fairly good at the game and are able to procure their specced weapons 24/7 anyways). Thus, give an extra spec to all warrior classes AND an enhanced specialization skill to mercs (which effectively doubles the bonus of spec to one weapon of their choice which was is already specialized in). At the next aging allow them another enchanced spec to give 2x spec bonus for 2 weapons or 4x bonus for one weapon (that was already enhance specialized in). This would be more than enough to make the merc specialization still far and beyond stronger than any of the other classes. It also allows them to keep up with weapon changes which are unforseen and uncontrollable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:56 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:38 pm
Posts: 34
Location: Central
4x specialize speed for a weapon? That'll give you at least 6 or so attacks each round without haste. Much overpowered if you ask me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:00 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Boston, USA
SK Character: Sorel
Weapons cap at 5 attacks without haste.

However, you just brought up a good point. It just occured to me this would heavily stacked in favor of slow, damaging weapons (landsknechts, claymores, etc.).

New idea:

enchanced specialize- increases accuracy and damage by a scaled amount. The damage increase for faster weapons would have to be lower then that for slower weapons, or else the faster weapons would receive too much of an edge.

Super enhanced specialize- triples the above bonus.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:06 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 4:18 pm
Posts: 2026
Location: In the palm of the left hand black
Here is what I would like to see, a spec at second aging that can be put into any skill for a rogue, merc, barb, hellion, paladin. allow a merc to be the only class that can double special in a weapon (but the second specialization has to come through the aging).

This way, a rogue might decide to specialize in steal, scrolls, trip, dirt kick, ect, giving it some sort of appropriate benefit. ie higher % chance of succeeding, perhaps work at lvl 51 or 52, ect, these can be worked on later. A merc might decide to specialize in retreating..a barb in fury, ect.

Paladins could specialize in holy word, or parrying, hellions might specilize in cleave or plague..ect.


The way I think spellcasting should work is that it reduces the concentration for the spell and the mana costs and allows the spellcaster to cast the spell as if they were one level higher (like the bard song allows) but leaves casting times the same.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:46 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:22 am
Posts: 214
Location: n, n, ne, se, e, e, s, doorway
I like the concept of compensating straight melee classes with something as they age (barbs, mercs, swashies, rogues). I don't know what that something could be, I don't think another spec, or giving specs to non-merc classes is the way to go, necessarilly. Maybe something specific to each class. Maybe something like, +1 to hit and damage per age, bonus att points.. who knows.

While I do agree, aging is not so attrocious that a melee class should delete with age, they do get kind of <inappropriate comment removed>.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:05 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:48 am
Posts: 1306
I believe it would be nice to give aging warriors some benefit, and I'd be happy to see them get it at first aging (as well as mages getting bonuses to stats at first aging!).

Don't give them something already made, however. This is a great opportunity for diversity: add something new!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:17 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:52 am
Posts: 1273
Location: Dark side of the moon
How about instead of giving the warriors a specialize, the game records the weapon they use the most and gives them a sort of bonus to wielding it. But that bonus wouldn't be as good as specialize.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:17 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 7:39 pm
Posts: 654
They all shouldn't get specialize, but they should get something. The physical decreases can really hurt a fighter class and the increases to intellect and wisdom really don't achieve anything. Perhaps if they've stayed low enough that the more frequent improvements at skills will occur, but by they time they start aging odds are most fighters will be GM or have the skills they've already learned mastered. Perhaps give them each something different that would be a class advantage. Rogues can sneak longer, scouts can fletch an extra arrow or two, barbarians are just a touch more accurate with brawling, mercenaries get an extra specialize point, swashbucklers get a single specialize point their entire life which would be useful only for heavy swords or daggers. Nothing that would make a tremendous difference, but something that would make the aging process more balanced. Right now an old warrior is going to be weak as sin while an aged mage is only going to be that much stronger.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:06 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 222
Location: Kansas City, MO
What if the stats lost to aging were simply given back to the character, if they were trained up to that level that it actually decreased a natural statistic. You could train the stat point elsewhere, in hp, mana, move, art, int, wis, cha. This would give warriors at least zero loss in stat points, they just have to redistribute. Giant strength and haste should be readily available to an older warrior who has had time to make some friends.

E


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group