Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:08 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 9:14 am 
Offline
Immortal (Inactive)

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 198
Location: Behind you, look!
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
Additionally, if you try to argue in favor of them to D, using calm, logical statements, you just get the silent treatment and outright ignored.


That's not true. :(


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 9:18 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 10:42 am
Posts: 1053
For OA it really is. For good reason!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 10:26 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:54 pm
Posts: 2765
Location: Pyrgos, Greece
Finney, that was a comment to what OA said(and even Marfik and alvarro commented afterwards).

I still insist on adding halfling shamans, RP and mechanics wise they would rock. Giants hellions would be totally imba as a combo, cleave with a maledicted greataxe and spam bash.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 11:32 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
Marfik wrote:
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
Additionally, if you try to argue in favor of them to D, using calm, logical statements, you just get the silent treatment and outright ignored.


That's not true. :(


Yes it is. As soon as his argument comes down to "I DON'T WANNA!" rather than fess up and say as much he just shuts down entirely and stops responding at all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:10 am
Posts: 135
Location: Far, far away
Giant hellions would require giant paladins, and that would just suck.
Paladins, as far as I know, are far more spell-dependent than
hellions (Since they have cleave).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:03 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 1:19 pm
Posts: 1896
I dont see why a halfling sorc would rock so much. They dont have amazing int or wis. Unless you are just referring to the spell damage reduction. In that case, enchant like crazy for MR and you wont even be touched.

If its for the hide... meh


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:41 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:28 am
Posts: 1538
Hide, invis, sneak, fly and ethereal! You'd be a like a freakin ninja.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:57 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 8:08 am
Posts: 1232
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
A halfling sorceror would indeed be sick as hell. My favorite polymorph is a halfling just for that reason. Hide + Sneak + natural MP and your sorceror is damn near untouchable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:01 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 8:08 am
Posts: 1232
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
On that note, halfling shamans and sorcerors do make sense in my opinion, more sense than giant warlocks anyways.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 8:37 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 5:21 pm
Posts: 1174
Location: Dänimarka
Giant hellions, and griffon palardins as counterpart to that *shrieks*.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group