Sypher wrote:
Sklz711 wrote:
Sypher wrote:
Yeah, I've got to agree with Syn actually, a shaman in good mithril or dragonscale +MV is going to tank better than any adamantite wearing merc, a barb isn't even close. Barbs are generally rather horrible tanks.
I sincerely doubt it, mithril doesn't work with MV so I doubt it's even close, but dragonscale/MV might be better. With the same spells up, merc is going to be better due to heavy armor bonus and parry/eparry and a larger HP pool. Not to mention even using a one hander and shield is likely going to deal more damage in the interim requiring him to tank for a smaller amount of time overall.
Sure, obviously spirit aura + adamantite is better than spirit aura + mithril, but we were just comparing class per class, not a merc + vials/scripts. Even so, spirit aura is really only good if you have strong/powerful spells of it, and most vials around only hold weak spells. A shaman with SA + sanc wearing a shield is going to tank better than a standard merc with a shield/one hander. Especially if you factor in the shamans spells such as blindness/weaken/poison/plague, they can just debuff their opponent to hell.
I wasn't really counting Spirit Aura, but considering you're counting magical vestments for a shaman, I'll give the merc Sanc. Also, to tank you have to be front row, and if you're front row you're easily bashed negating all your debuffs.
I'm not really talking about the class as a whole, I'm talking about tanking ability, and I don't really see a way that the merc isn't going to win the tanking contest with equal prep.