Shattered Kingdoms

Question, if a Griffon with an obvious light aura cannot be a part of the Mrfik church anymore, then why can a deep-elf with an obvious dark arua can be? That makes no sense and is hipocritical. You have a deep-elf in your church who isnt a grey arua but you remove a griffon from your chruch who plays the role perfectly? Can we say hipocrate

He wasn't removed because he was light aura. He was removed because he was light aura RPing as if he were grey.

well in either case I believe it to be hipocrytical. If one is not allowed then the other should be the same. If he stated that it be only grey auras, then any who are not grey should be removed, to be fair to all.


On a side note, i love this little guy. Prolly the best emoticon on the list. So......active

That's the trick though. Lighties ARE allowed still. Darkies ARE allowed. The problems only arises when someone doesn't RP their character properly. Imagine a lightie slaughtering the weak and innocent at every turn. Is that a lightie? No, that's someone who rolled scrupulous or principled that is active as if they were diabolic, this is the same thing except they were rping anarchist when their alignment was scrupulous.

Light auras and dark auras are still allowed in the church. They're just not allowed to pretend they're gray auras. (In retrospect, it's easier to bend alignment with a dark aura since everything is explainable with some evil murderous plot, but...)

There can be many lightie ways to see the faith in Chaos. And of course too many darkie ones for me to need to elaborate.

HYPOCRITE.

IT IS SPELLED HYPOCRITE.

THE ADJECTIVE IS HYPOCRITICAL.

THE ADVERB IS HYPOCRITICALLY.

Mommy, where do baby hippogriffs come from?