Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide		 VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 8:33 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Open Forums » Gameplay

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Laechlyn
 Post subject: Warlocks and Pets
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:11 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:45 am
Posts: 75
Why can't warlocks have pets, when sorcerors and necromancers can? Is it because warlocks don't need to concentrate on their elementals or what? Just doesn't seem to make any sense to me.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Dexity
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:43 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: With a patuty in mah sewty
SK Character: Ivstnesr, Drakey
this thread x 50
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Dulrik
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:29 pm 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-ass that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.

Believe it, or not?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
the_skaddict
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:08 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 319
Location: The 316
Dulrik wrote:
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.

Believe it, or not?



1 word: Lorzatzu
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Teh_Peso
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:14 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:27 am
Posts: 5014
Location: Hiding
the_skaddict wrote:
Dulrik wrote:
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.

Believe it, or not?



1 word: Lorzatzu


Hehe.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
laeZ1
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:49 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:11 am
Posts: 941
Teh_Peso wrote:
the_skaddict wrote:
Dulrik wrote:
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.

Believe it, or not?



1 word: Lorzatzu


Hehe.

I assume Lorzatzu was a character that was a warlock that owned face that was the cause of wimping warlocks.

Right?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Aust
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:22 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 10:51 am
Posts: 317
laeZ1 wrote:
Teh_Peso wrote:
the_skaddict wrote:
Dulrik wrote:
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.

Believe it, or not?



1 word: Lorzatzu


Hehe.

I assume Lorzatzu was a character that was a warlock that owned face that was the cause of wimping warlocks.

Right?


No, but Lorzatu was.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Dexity
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:18 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:43 pm
Posts: 1397
Location: With a patuty in mah sewty
SK Character: Ivstnesr, Drakey
I remember those days, I actually had a lock back then (my first char never made it to magma lol) but now, they do need help, I am a fairly experienced player and MOST other classes can out PK me.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
the_skaddict
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:14 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 319
Location: The 316
Aust wrote:
laeZ1 wrote:
Teh_Peso wrote:
the_skaddict wrote:
Dulrik wrote:
Once upon a time, warlocks were so bad-rear that letting them stand in the third row without needing another player was considered broken.

Believe it, or not?



1 word: Lorzatzu


Hehe.

I assume Lorzatzu was a character that was a warlock that owned face that was the cause of wimping warlocks.

Right?



No, but Lorzatu was.


Hey, no need to be rude. My bad for mis-spelling a name from around a decade ago... [REDACTED].
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
ladyjennbo
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:47 pm
Posts: 3776
Location: Virginia
SK Character: Amorette
I'm probably the only one, but I don't think necros or warlocks or sorcs or Hammer should be able to hold a steed/charm/warlock/undead and a pet. You get one pet, bottom line.

-edit-
Except necros, obviously, but they shouldn't be able to have a pet and a massive undead army.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » Open Forums » Gameplay

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 164 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group