Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:36 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:13 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
TheBladeMasta wrote:
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
TheBladeMasta wrote:
Give them e-parry, and make the chances of a trip or bash succeeding while dancing much lower then it is currently.

This would actually allow them to survive for a while in the front row.


Dance already gives a chance to avoid trip and bash.


Which is why I said, "lower then it is currently"
How often do you honestly see a bash/trip miss on a bard while dancing?
You're more likely to dodge a bash as a sprite then a dancing bard, though a sprite bard could be dangerous. :P


Actually, you ARE right that the amount that dance helps to dodge trip/bash is pretty low, but I think if they had e-parry (so they could, you know, parry with a whip and the like) that it would offset the lack of dance's boost to defense.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:14 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:18 pm
Posts: 1704
Anyone else disgusted when they see threads asking for classes to be made stronger when the author currently plays that class?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 9:36 pm
Posts: 1271
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Gilgon wrote:
Anyone else disgusted when they see threads asking for classes to be made stronger when the author currently plays that class?


Yes, and that should be the poll.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:18 am 
Gilgon wrote:
Anyone else disgusted when they see threads asking for classes to be made stronger when the author currently plays that class?


Who else would know about the class, other than someone who is playing it?


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:20 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 9:36 pm
Posts: 1271
Location: Harrisburg, PA
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
Actually, you ARE right


You do realize he said "you're" not "your. Are apostrophes not allowed to be used to join words in Canada?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:21 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
Lakir wrote:
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
Actually, you ARE right


You do realize he said "you're" not "your. Are apostrophes not allowed to be used to join words in Canada?


I was putting emphasis on MY statement, not correcting someone who clearly already can tell the difference between "you're" and "your." Now stop being bitter that you learned a bit of grammar.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:21 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 9:36 pm
Posts: 1271
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Syndal wrote:
Who else would know about the class, other than someone who is playing it?


Someone who has played it, someone who see's someone else playing and thinks to themselves "Wow that really sucks"

Before someone else points it out, I was a big advocate of 'buff the warlocks' before the recent code update, but so were a lot of people that were not playing warlocks at the time so :-P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:24 am 
It's not like I'm the first person to ever bring this up. And it makes no sense at all for bards to just get parry. When they can't really use it.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:26 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 9:36 pm
Posts: 1271
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Syndal wrote:
It's not like I'm the first person to every bring this up. And it makes no sense at all for bards to just get parry. When they can't use it.


Considering you can't use a shield while holding a landy, your suggesting that bards get shield block so that when they use one specific sub-type they are able to shield block, whereas if you were using any other sub-type you would be able to use the parry skill you already have?

I don't disagree with your reasons for using those sub-types, but you can't have your cake and eat it too!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:28 am 
Actually, if you had shield block and dodge, it'd be a lot more feasible to be in the front row, rather than parry and dodge, if you ask me.

I think you'll live longer with a shield/sword or dagger than with a flamberge.


Last edited by Syndal on Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group