Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 7:32 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 191 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:43 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:27 am
Posts: 166
Rial wrote:
Before Dulrik makes any changes to scrolls or charm I hope he goes ahead and does some tests to see how effective scrolls really are. Considering 20 or so will seems to be enough to resist the majority of charm spells by a 16 art sorcerer, I'm going to go ahead and say 12 will is enough to resist the vast majority of charm attempts via scrolls. Thats 3 greater will items. If 3 greater will items is all it takes then Dulrik should lock this thread.


Yes, you can resist the majority of scrolls if you have greater than a certain amount of willpower. But there is a "significant minority" where you don't resist. The mechanics of how scrolls work make this significant minority an issue.

So fine, do your tests, but remember that, say, a 1 in 4 (resisting the majority)chance of being charmed by a scroll gives a 58% chance of being charmed after 3 scroll recites - which at the moment takes very little time at all - you are more likely than not to be charmed within what, 2 or 3 rounds of combat? And charm now means death if the charmer so wishes it.

If people only have very few strong scrolls then the "decision tree" here becomes much more balanced and interesting.

And I haven't even started to address what Konge refers to.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:01 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 2323
SK Character: Airkli
It shouldn't be the obligation of every sorc and priest to spend so much RL time enchanting everyone's gear because of one overpowered spell. Due to my personal sympathy towards those two classes for the constant requests for favors (shrink, res, enchant, scribe, brew etc.) I never ask for enchants on any character. I think it's moronic that anyone should spend so much time in game preparing equipment in the hopes they wont get completely obliterated.

-The scrolls have a ridiculously long duration.

-The level at which CP is available is dramatically too low, with how it's being used nowadays.

If charm doesn't see a change, at least lower the ME and time costs it takes to cast enchant armor so actually preparing for it/helping others prepare isn't as much of a chore.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:47 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 1725
Location: Rockin' your world
SK Character: Snuffles
Quote:
Ealuriel replies 'I have nearly forty runes of willpower, and Aldric charmed me on his second casting.'


Nuff said.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:07 am
Posts: 473
Location: Canada
SK Character: Zarg
Sakhul wrote:
Quote:
Ealuriel replies 'I have nearly forty runes of willpower, and Aldric charmed me on his second casting.'


Nuff said.


There is always a chance that you will fail to resist a spell, always. Just because you have great deal of enchantments doesn't mean you are the Juggernaut.

Here is my question REGARDLESS if it was or was not clear to people that to do when under the effects of charm person, where was the outcry about the spell before the change? Oh that's right it was easy to break it without actually breaking it yourself. Be it a tell or just pissing off the person who had done the charming to the point they either kill you or dump you somewhere.

Has the concentration changed? Has the spell's level changed?

I believe the answer is no. Not to long ago people wouldn't even use charm person on a PC because they knew it wouldn't be long before someone "mysteriously" came a broke the spell. Now that the spell is useful it will be used again. You have no one to blame other then the people that had previously exploited the old charm person effects.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 1725
Location: Rockin' your world
SK Character: Snuffles
help deep-elf wrote:
Deep-elves are slightly shorter than humans and have a much lighter build. They lack the strength and stamina of the other races, but are more agile and intelligent. They are inherently evil both from their racial heritage and their upbringing. Their fey blood provides them with many special abilities including the ability to detect magic, use faerie fire, see in the dark and move silently, as well as a strong resistance to magic and charm effects. However, deep-elves also have many weaknesses including vulnerabilities to poison, disease, light and the touch of common iron.


It's not empirical evidence, nor does being hit on the second cast constitute a proper test. It just seems overpowered that someone in that position gets hit by an I-win spell.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:11 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
Sakhul wrote:
help deep-elf wrote:
Deep-elves are slightly shorter than humans and have a much lighter build. They lack the strength and stamina of the other races, but are more agile and intelligent. They are inherently evil both from their racial heritage and their upbringing. Their fey blood provides them with many special abilities including the ability to detect magic, use faerie fire, see in the dark and move silently, as well as a strong resistance to magic and charm effects. However, deep-elves also have many weaknesses including vulnerabilities to poison, disease, light and the touch of common iron.


It's not empirical evidence, nor does being hit on the second cast constitute a proper test. It just seems overpowered that someone in that position gets hit by an I-win spell.


Racial bonuses count, in large part, for literally jack and [REDACTED]. If it's the racial bonus you're complaining about, as in it's stated in the help file but empirically has little to no presence in a practical sense, you're not the first, and you won't be the last.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:21 am 
Offline
Immortal

Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 8:16 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
SK Character: Achernar
I have seen this complaint several times. I have no way of knowing the answer, but my opinion is whatever rating racial bonuses are at is not really significant enough bonus to bother mentioning. I agree. If it says someone is resistant to charm it shouldn't be the preferred method of taking out that race. Right now races resistant to charm seem to be getting nothing from the benefit which most certainly is factored into their build and how it is balanced with other races.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:23 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 1:58 am
Posts: 2423
Location: Athens, Greece
Trexor wrote:
Sakhul wrote:
Quote:
Ealuriel replies 'I have nearly forty runes of willpower, and Aldric charmed me on his second casting.'


Nuff said.


There is always a chance that you will fail to resist a spell, always. Just because you have great deal of enchantments doesn't mean you are the Juggernaut.

Here is my question REGARDLESS if it was or was not clear to people that to do when under the effects of charm person, where was the outcry about the spell before the change? Oh that's right it was easy to break it without actually breaking it yourself. Be it a tell or just pissing off the person who had done the charming to the point they either kill you or dump you somewhere.

Has the concentration changed? Has the spell's level changed?

I believe the answer is no. Not to long ago people wouldn't even use charm person on a PC because they knew it wouldn't be long before someone "mysteriously" came a broke the spell. Now that the spell is useful it will be used again. You have no one to blame other then the people that had previously exploited the old charm person effects.


Sorry for the chain, but yes, very well said. As Yoru I got sick of the cases where I had, say a magic carpet as a pet, and the MOMENT I charmed someone he threw 1 line: "OMG I H8 CARPETS", and insta-attacked my pet to cause havoc and try to break the charm. Or obey simple commands his charmer gave or whatever. During all the time I played Yoru, I tried to charm several people, and only... *drum roll please* two cases stood there and RPed charmie. Guess who were the only two charmies I never tried to harm. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 8:28 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:02 pm
Posts: 748
Ealuriel was lying. Show an actual uninterrupted log where someone with 40 will actually has charm tested on them, not a line from some char who is probably lying to make herself seem more powerful. 40 will -IS- going to make you a juggernaut when it comes to charm. Charm isn't going to hit even 1/200 times when you have 40 will. I'm sure Dulrik can take a look at the code and confirm this.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:47 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:00 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI
SK Character: That one guy who pk'd you.
Rial wrote:
Ealuriel was lying. Show an actual uninterrupted log where someone with 40 will actually has charm tested on them, not a line from some char who is probably lying to make herself seem more powerful. 40 will -IS- going to make you a juggernaut when it comes to charm. Charm isn't going to hit even 1/200 times when you have 40 will. I'm sure Dulrik can take a look at the code and confirm this.


Actually, the code won't tell you anything. Since it is the number generator that will say if you save against the spell or not. Sure the likeliness is smaller the better the enchants, but you will never be immune.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 191 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group