Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:45 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 242 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 25  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:01 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:22 pm
Posts: 1648
Dulrik wrote:
Umm... wat? You'd rather it fade or blow up then be maxed out? If you get that 5x in a row (and you have the spell mastered), you should take it as a hint that it is probably as good as you are going to be able to make it.

Previous to the changes, you almost certainly would have faded or blown it up instead, which would force you to start over. How does that result save you time?

Sounds reasonable. Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:06 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:01 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: I'm in a glass case of emotion!
SK Character: Retired Troll
Hi, Dulrik, what determines how many enchantments an item can hold before the risk of fading/exploding becomes really high? Material and quality?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:16 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
That am secrat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:20 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:47 pm
Posts: 3776
Location: Virginia
SK Character: Amorette
Dulrik wrote:
Umm... wat? You'd rather it fade or blow up then be maxed out? If you get that 5x in a row (and you have the spell mastered), you should take it as a hint that it is probably as good as you are going to be able to make it.

Previous to the changes, you almost certainly would have faded or blown it up instead, which would force you to start over. How does that result save you time?


I tried it on an item with no enchantments (cute little dolly) and I got that message probably 3-4 times anyway.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:43 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:22 pm
Posts: 1648
ladyjennbo wrote:
Dulrik wrote:
Umm... wat? You'd rather it fade or blow up then be maxed out? If you get that 5x in a row (and you have the spell mastered), you should take it as a hint that it is probably as good as you are going to be able to make it.

Previous to the changes, you almost certainly would have faded or blown it up instead, which would force you to start over. How does that result save you time?


I tried it on an item with no enchantments (cute little dolly) and I got that message probably 3-4 times anyway.

Then it's obviously about to fade or blow up. D's code is flawless! Right...D??? :-?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
There's no accounting for pure bad luck. That's why I said "probably". As in, there is a high probability, but not guaranteed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 4:06 am
Posts: 756
Location: Murfreesboro/Cookeville, Tennessee
The "Item is maxed out" thing makes sense to me, and if practice agreed with that, I'd live with it. However, I hit the string of "nothing happened" on the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth endowment. I can reliably hit 4-5 endowments before fading and blowing up, but in between each endowment I am still blowing a quarter of my mana pool on "Nothing happened' with the mana sink progressively getting more and more with each added enchant. It's not like it consistently blows up after 5-6 "Nothings" for me, otherwise I would just take it as a hint as you say it should be.

tl;dr: I hit "Nothing happened" message rather consistently no matter what stage in the enchanting process I am. It just gets progressive worse as I add more enchantments.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:23 pm 
Offline
Implementor

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 8220
Location: Redwood City, California
Hmmm. Well it's not impossible that you are correct. But my primary goal was to add customizability, not reduce the grind. Reducing grind was more of a side affect, which I think has still been successful when compared to the old system.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:43 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 4:06 am
Posts: 756
Location: Murfreesboro/Cookeville, Tennessee
Oh. I was under the impression you wanted to lessen the grind too. Oh well, the change is still a good one as far as customization goes. Not sure how the reduced saves will play out, but it'll reveal itself eventually. Thanks, D.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Code Update 11/24/2012 Q&A
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
Yeah, the nothing seemed to happen percentage definitely was increased during the enchant changes. By a lot. Also, doesn't that still cause item level to increase without actually providing any benefit?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 242 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 25  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group