Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:47 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:23 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: Canada
SK Character: Karsh
ObjectivistActivist wrote:
Given this apparently new opinion on the staff that every pk needs to be preceded by at least dinner, and dancing or a movie, and then to have a consent form signed by the target, I'm going to remind them that there is no separation between mechanics and RP in this game.

Therefore, once that lobster has been sprung for, the credits roll, and the consent form is signed (and notarized!), failure of the other party to engage in mechanical combat constitutes just as much breach of RP as failure to stroke the hand of the target on the part of the aggressor. There are plenty of players (who involve themselves in factions, and carry limited loot often obtained by pk from their allies) who will log out, or go hide in some random wilderness room and refuse to meet an even challenge (even while their bounty NPCs are screaming about dying in droves). If aggressors are going to be threatened for failing to go buy condoms before they go on the offensive, then the defenders ought to face the same penalties for failure to meet the challenge in a mechanical sense. I'm not talking about people that bail from 6 v 2. I'm talking about people that refuse to go 1 v 1 or engage in similar sized group pk.

I think the fact that mechanics and faction membership are a built-in part of RP and that flowery emotes and says are not the only thing that constitutes RP in this game needs to be remembered on-high. Let's not pretend we can have our cake and eat it too. If you're going to insist on the flowery emotes to enemies, then insist as well on mechanical participation. The same penalties ought to apply.


That is what I'm referring to when speaking of equal enforcement.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Immortal

Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 9:16 am
Posts: 1567
SK Character: NA - Inactive
Flowery emotes and dinner are unnecessary.

I'm not opposed to creating IC repercussions for tribunal members who refuse to uphold their oaths.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:40 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm
Posts: 5522
Which ... don't include walking into an "imminent despair" PVP scenario against people who haven't roleplayed the conflict in days? Just thought I'd clear that up.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:16 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 5:07 pm
Posts: 499
Location: Alera
dalamar wrote:
I'm not opposed to creating IC repercussions for tribunal members who refuse to uphold their oaths.


The tarnish command already exists. Just needs more liberal application, methinks, with some roleplayed harsh words and wrist slaps.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:47 pm
Posts: 3776
Location: Virginia
SK Character: Amorette
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:50 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 11:51 am
Posts: 1500
MsPooperTrooper wrote:
dalamar wrote:
I'm not opposed to creating IC repercussions for tribunal members who refuse to uphold their oaths.


The tarnish command already exists. Just needs more liberal application, methinks, with some roleplayed harsh words and wrist slaps.



The staff should mete out punishment to the leadership of tribunals, if individual members refuse and/or neglect their duty to defend their kingdom. It is the Sergeant Hartman method: You don't punish Private Pyle for eating the jelly doughnut, you punish the leadership for not giving him the proper motivation to behave correctly.


Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:20 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm
Posts: 5522
Granting existing imperfections, that's a recipe for either 1) trib drama or 2) YIM tribs.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:41 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 11:51 am
Posts: 1500
grep wrote:
Granting existing imperfections, that's a recipe for either 1) trib drama or 2) YIM tribs.


If tribunal members are not honoring their oath and doing their duty, I would suggest drama in the form of tarnish or new leadership is exactly what is needed. The second item on your list already plagues SK, so I don't know how it applies here more than normal.


Last edited by FinneyOwnzU on Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:47 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:50 pm
Posts: 5522
The natural extension of drama being removed. What kind of group isn't drama? One that's already a group. It's an unintendedly icky equilibrium, in that sense.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Well Hi There, I'm Coming To Kill You.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:52 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:05 am
Posts: 333
Location: Newbtown
FinneyOwnzU wrote:
If tribunal members are not honoring their oath and doing their duty, I would suggest drama in the form of tarnish or new leadership is exactly what is needed. The second item on your list already plagues SK, so I don't know how it applies here more than normal.

There just aren't enough players who want to take on this kind of responsibility to make punishing leaders for the actions of followers a worthwhile course of action for overall MUD health. It's enough of a headache being a tribunal leader as it is. If I could get punished for what other people do, perhaps even if I'm unaware of what's happening or offline at the time of any punishable incident, I would simply never induct anyone into my tribunal and just run a one-man defense force. That, or run the Black Hand where you really have no oath or definite responsibility because it is assumed the entire government is corrupt and evil.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group