Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Mon Dec 23, 2024 10:52 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Fire elementals - Immune?
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:12 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 2323
SK Character: Airkli
Code:
A tiny sprite Speaker smiles as a fire elemental staggers under the impact of her column of fire!


NPC uses flamestrike.. my elemental made of fire is thereby hurt by it? Im hoping this is a bug, or have elementals been nerfed?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:58 pm 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:41 pm
Posts: 1085
Location: Hugging a tree
SK Character: Imolth
I think it was always that way with flamestrike, though I could be wrong. Something about the flames summoned are not elemental but divine.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:23 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:48 am
Posts: 1306
Likely a feature, and not a bug. Always offended my Final Fantasy sense of elements.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:02 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:26 am
Posts: 1908
Location: Under my covers... sleeping
In my opinion, a fire elemental should not be immune to fire, but should take very little damage from it. Yes, yes, why would a fire elemental take damage from fire? Doesn't make sense? Indeed, it doesn't. While the fire elemental is immune to fire, its not immune to force of the column landing on it. Hence, the little damage.

You could also argue this in a number of ways as well, but thats just one take. Personally, IMO, the damage should be so minimal, its a moot point.

sleeper


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:14 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:05 pm
Posts: 222
Should heal it, just like cause light/serious/critical and harm heals undead, and healing spells harms them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:07 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:32 pm
Posts: 424
The help file on Flamestrike says that its launched from the heavens, kinda implying divine damage too. Like hellfire is both fire and negative so it gets around those kinda resists.

Um, I'm so trying to think of a DnD spell that uses such a thing to allow for some damage because of resist. Ok I feel stupid, flame strike. Same spell. For those of the D20 persuasion flame strike is a mid caster level spell that is a downward spiral of flame. Half the damage is from divine source and not subject to reduction, though the other half is still fire damage.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:43 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 2323
SK Character: Airkli
Quote:
In my opinion, a fire elemental should not be immune to fire, but should take very little damage from it. Yes, yes, why would a fire elemental take damage from fire? Doesn't make sense? Indeed, it doesn't. While the fire elemental is immune to fire, its not immune to force of the column landing on it. Hence, the little damage.


Real life is irrelevant to computer games, but throwing more burning things on a fire source will only make it bigger, not diminish the flames.

I like phiezel's idea though. Add to the fire, make it better.

Understandable though.. if flamestrikes are divine, then there should be damage. I just didnt think about that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:17 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:19 pm
Posts: 425
archaicsmurf wrote:

Real life is irrelevant to computer games, but throwing more burning things on a fire source will only make it bigger, not diminish the flames.

I like phiezel's idea though. Add to the fire, make it better.

Understandable though.. if flamestrikes are divine, then there should be damage. I just didnt think about that.


If we're trying to apply real-life physics to fire elementals, then we have to consider what fire is in real life- The visible reaction of combustable material with oxygen to produce heat, light, probably carbon dioxide, and other stuff.

Thus a 'real life' fire elemental would need some sort of fuel source and oxygen source. Engulfing such an elemental in another fire would deplete its oxygen and/or fuel supply, thereby shortening the life of the elemental, which could be considered a way of 'damaging' it because eventually its fuel supply would be depleted.


Regardless of all of this, I think it is safer to assume that SK flamestrike is similar to DnD flamestrike:
DnD SRD wrote:
A flame strike produces a vertical column of divine fire roaring downward. The spell deals 1d6 points of damage per caster level (maximum 15d6). Half the damage is fire damage, but the other half results directly from divine power and is therefore not subject to being reduced by resistance to fire-based attacks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:28 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 1:58 am
Posts: 2423
Location: Athens, Greece
Fire elementals are immune to fire elemental damage. Flamestrike, just like Hellfire, are not pure elemental damage. They are 50-50 with divine/negative energy damage I think.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:18 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 2323
SK Character: Airkli
theDrifter wrote:
archaicsmurf wrote:

Real life is irrelevant to computer games, but throwing more burning things on a fire source will only make it bigger, not diminish the flames.

I like phiezel's idea though. Add to the fire, make it better.

Understandable though.. if flamestrikes are divine, then there should be damage. I just didnt think about that.


If we're trying to apply real-life physics to fire elementals, then we have to consider what fire is in real life- The visible reaction of combustable material with oxygen to produce heat, light, probably carbon dioxide, and other stuff.

Thus a 'real life' fire elemental would need some sort of fuel source and oxygen source. Engulfing such an elemental in another fire would deplete its oxygen and/or fuel supply, thereby shortening the life of the elemental, which could be considered a way of 'damaging' it because eventually its fuel supply would be depleted.


Regardless of all of this, I think it is safer to assume that SK flamestrike is similar to DnD flamestrike:
DnD SRD wrote:
A flame strike produces a vertical column of divine fire roaring downward. The spell deals 1d6 points of damage per caster level (maximum 15d6). Half the damage is fire damage, but the other half results directly from divine power and is therefore not subject to being reduced by resistance to fire-based attacks.


*blink* o_o

Fire is fire no matter the source, magic or combustion.

But.. in flamestrike's case, it is clearly not fire, just a divine representation of fire.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group